After hurricane Gustav’s glancing blow derailed the Republican convention for a day, the news media and tabloids are all over hurricane Bristol, the real storm which is at the center of this year’s GOP festivities that threatens to expose the hypocrisy of the party’s "Family Values" bigots. Of course, the sanctimonious right wing morality brigade is spinning like Dervishes to put a holier than thou gloss over Sarah Palin’s messy personal story. John McCain is resolute in his claim that Palin was thoroughly vetted but nobody is buying. The public too sees the irony of the events that have unfolded at the cost of one 17 year old whose ambitious parents spared little thought before pushing her into the national limelight at a vulnerable time in her young life. Many are asking now, "What about other young pregnant teens, especially poor ones, who may or may not have the financial or family support that Bristol Palin apparently does? Will the Republican Party show the same understanding and sympathy for them?"
Here is a sample of letters to the editor in today’s Houston Chronicle; only one letter asks everyone to butt out of Sarah Palin’s personal life. And a cartoon by Chronicle’s Nick Anderson. (Anderson should have added, "…and I am a Democrat" to the young woman’s statement."

A woman’s place
With the announcement that her 17-year-old daughter is pregnant, how can Sarah Palin possibly think she can continue her run for the Republican vice presidency? The GOP players have been quick to praise her family values, but I question the values of any woman who would leave a special needs infant and her pregnant teenage daughter to gallivant around the nation in a frantic, round-the-clock campaign for vice president.
Palin’s family is in crisis and, at the risk of sounding like some moldy leftover from the 1950s, her place is at home right now tending to her five children. Women can have it all. They just can’t have it all at the same time.
BETSY DOLAN
Sugar Land
Abstinence’s failure
There is one good policy — not political — reason why the pregnancy of Gov. Sarah Palin’s unmarried, 17-year-old daughter cannot be ignored, despite the wish of all of us to leave her family alone. That reason is that Palin and other social conservatives fight the teaching of birth control to teenagers and believe that abstinence is the only answer to unwanted pregnancy. Though it would be nice to believe that our children will wait until they are married to engage in sexual activities, or become 40-year-old virgins, it is not practical.
Fortunately, Bristol Palin has caring parents to help her through this tough time. Many do not, and, as usual, conservatives could care less about their problems.
Abstinence is simply another pie-in-the-sky, failed conservative nonsolution to a major problem.
MICHAEL D. BURKE
HoustonNo ifs about this if
Regarding Tuesday’s Page A8 article "PALIN’S SURPRISE / Pregnancy announcement draws GOP support / Running mate true to consistent, ‘pro-life message’ ": If the shoe were on the other foot and it was a Democratic candidate with a 17-year-old unmarried, pregnant daughter, we would hear about the Democrats’ having no family values!
JOAN DOLEN
HoustonWaiting for apology
After hearing the absolutely shocking news Monday that the unmarried, 17-year-old daughter of the new Republican vice-presidential nominee, Sara Palin, is five months pregnant, I immediately thought of how ugly the press, conservatives and late-night talk show hosts were of Britney Spear’s sister, Jamie Lynn, when she too became pregnant at a very early age. Both of these young "girls" are in an identical situation, so all those ultra-conservative right-wingers now better apologize for those mean comments and jokes, or give Palin’s daughter the exact same treatment. I hope they choose the apology.
If John McCain is trying his best to win the women and ultraconservative votes by presenting Palin as a "family" example, then he should understand that her husband spends months on Alaska’s North Slope away from his family, mom works long hours as a governor and essentially must raise her children with nannies. These are the family values the Republican Party wants us to strive for?
When neither parent is home, kids tend to get in some form of trouble — case in point.
JOE H. HICKMAN
HoustonSounds pro-choice
Gov. Sarah Palin’s teenage daughter is pregnant, and there is a lot of talk about this being a private family matter, as it should be. But let me make sure I understand Palin’s and the Republican Party’s position correctly. Palin’s daughter chose to keep the baby and marry her boyfriend, and her family kindly asks that the public let the family deal with this in private.
So Palin’s daughter’s reproductive choices are a private matter? Wow, it sounds like what pro-choice advocates have said all along. A woman’s reproductive decisions are best left up to her, her family and her physician.
DAWN BRUM
BaytownNot our business
The media is sick, sick, sick. Sarah Palin’s daughter is not running for any office. Whether she is pregnant or not has nothing to do with U.S. security, our energy problems, economics or health problems, and it is not anyone’s business. The media needs to get over it. Let the reporter cast the first stone whose family is without sin.
BOBBIE JOLLY
The Woodlands
3 responses to “Republican “Family Problems””
it never ceases to amaze me that an open society like you have in the US sohud make huge issues of personal life of politicians while a highly hypocritical society like we have in india totally ignore the personal life of the leaders.
LikeLike
Seriously, this was a choice by McCain’s campaign to publicize the private matter of Palin’s daughter, her state of pregnancy, her boyfriend etc.They are making a media circus out of it, trying to make scrambled eggs out of the cracked egg they have, maybe garnering a few sympathy votes even from evangelicals who might privately disagree with the way Palin has raised her family.
In India, any journalist who attempts to sensationalize tabloid stories about the personal shenanigans of a politician, is likely to ‘commit suicide’, a la Sr. Anupa Mary. So much for a ‘Free Press’.
LikeLike
Well , I agree with Joe Hickman. I also believe that with this revelation that her family demonstrates a lack of communication and basic trust. I’m sure Ms.Palin has explained the birds and bees to her daughter. So she decided ( made a choice ) to go ahead and disregard her mother and fathers teaching and advice and have a child out of wedlock. Now the Republicans are praising this ‘decision’ to keep the baby (pro-choice). Can’t everyone see the irony and downright smoke and mirror tricks going on here ? It’s a failure of family trust, a failure of espoused moral beliefs, and a breakdown in family communication.
Also, another thought. Is the Palin family paying for her daughters OB/GYN bills ? Or, does the state government of Alaska have a provision in their dependent health insurance to cover such situations ? I doubt that very much…but who knows, Alaska is the highest in teenage pregnancies. Or, is her daughter on Medicaid and asking the nation to foot the bill for her daughters rebellion ?
HER DAUGHTER IS NOT OFF LIMITS, by any means. She represents every moral issue the Republicans stand for.
Her whole family is in the ‘hot kitchen’, if she or the republicans can’t stand it…then get out while you can.
LikeLike