Way back in the day (last October) I went off on Dozier Internet Law for its absurd website terms-of-use page, which made a number of laughable legal claims; these appear to me to basically be intellectual-property claims couched in contract context. I was particularly impressed by the You May Not Link Here Clause: "we … do not allow any links to our site without our express permission."
Well, one Accidental Blogger reader recently brought to our attention a new suit filed by Dozier, in which it will reportedly sue an internet user for not linking to its website.* Nice!
—–
* I hope or assume that this description is an oversimplification. Really don’t care. I just like the implication that you can be sued for linking to Dozier’s stupid website or, in the alternative, for precisely the opposite.
Accidental Blogger 