Accidental Blogger

A general interest blog

In keeping with the custom of "What would Jesus do?," on every anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr Day, we hear references to MLK relating to social and political problems of the day. What might MLK have said of the Iraq War, the banking crisis, the presidency of Barack Obama and now the disaster in Haiti. Frankly, we don't know. We do know what he said about racial equality, economic fairness and the Vietnam War. Sure there are lessons from the past that apply to the present and they should be ongoing lessons, not just annual rituals. The solemn musings every January amount to something akin to Santa Clausification of MLK. 

It is not just Rev King who pops up once a year in the collective psyche of his fellow countrymen. Almost every nation has its hero, either a valiant savior or a voice of conscience. I speak from experience, having witnessed a similar phenomenon in another country that deifies another slain civil rights leader of world renown – Mahatama Gandhi of India. Indian leaders in almost every social sphere like to hark back to the life and struggles of Gandhi, whether relevant or not. Most conspicuously, they do so on the 2nd of October, Gandhi's birthday. It is another matter altogether that hardly any public policy, educational curriculum or the agenda of rising political stars are crafted in keeping with Gandhi's philosophy.  Call me unsentimental. But I find little utility in evoking historic figures at the onset of every new crisis, especially in a ritualistic way to mark this or that anniversary. It is quite natural for us to look back in a wave of nostalgia and admiration on the life and message on an iconic figure of the distant or proximate past and relate it to the current social milieu to celebrate his/her courage and vision but in the end, it is more useful to figure out what we are going to do.

Speaking of Gandhi, as is common with immigrants trying to recreate and transport a bit of the old country in their new surroundings, a group of Indian businessmen in Houston has succeeded in naming a district after Gandhi. The locality where the commemoration has taken place is populated by south Asian businesses. The effort to rename one of the busy streets after the Indian leader did not succeed (the petition drive failed to garner enough support). New municipal signs now sit atop the street signs at Harwin and Hillcroft  proclaiming the nearby area as Mahatma Gandhi District.

Mahatma Gandhi District

Well and good. But what I found a bit strange is the temple shape of the Gandhi signs and the orange borders, a color often associated with the Hindu religion. The irony is that the location also has many Pakistani-American owned stores. It is evident from the report that some are fuming.

Update:  In this post about King, Gandhi and in a tangential way Jesus, here is a piece of news that illustrates what I said about evoking peaceful figures for the wrong, feel good reasons. Let's also throw in some Gandhi grenades and MLK missiles for good measure. Then we will have a totally peaceful war.

Posted in , ,

6 responses to “Co-opting Civil Rights Icons – MLK and MKG”

  1. i remember quite vividly that you and i met courtesy of gandhi.
    i wrote a post and spelled his name incorrectly. you very kindly pointed this out. i was grateful. instant friendship ensued.
    how long ago was that i wonder? 2004? i’m fairly certain that we discussed this, not on my old blog, but in the comment section of a dadahead post.
    you and i, we’re blog vets.

    Like

  2. We did indeed meet over Gandhi and have been friends since. But it must have been 2005 because I did not start blogging until then and wasn’t familiar with Dadahead prior to that.
    How have you been? Speaking of being friends, are you on Facebook? If so, please join us there. Most of the A.B. gang is signed up.

    Like

  3. i’ve been on the fence about facebook. i do not currently have an account. if it means more web connection with ruchira writing, than it’s tempting. i will seriously consider it.
    i’ve been reluctant because i hear that once you sign up, all sorts of people from your past try to “friend” you. high school people, old co-workers. sounds like an absolute nightmare. so, maybe i can create an account without using my name. that might be okay.
    there needs to be a facebook type of site for introverts. one where you can connect, but only selectively, rarely. insteading “friending” people, you could “acquaintance” people.
    several people have encouraged me recently and they all said the same thing: “you have to get a facebook account. it’s like all of these people you’ve lost touch with will find you”. i didn’t know how to tell them that this was the opposite of what might appeal to me.
    still. if you have one, that’s differently. i’m conflicted.
    (i think i started the old blog in 2004, but i couldn’t remember when we began communicating. 2005 must have been it)

    Like

  4. I think you can be anonymous on Facebook and only connect with those with whom you want to. I joined when my daughter invited me. She probably regrets it now. I recently coerced Sujatha to join. She came on board after some trepidation and much procrastination. But I am having fun. It is really a giant social network – people snooping into each others daily lives, mostly. If that makes you uncomfortable, by all means stay away from Facebook. You can always get in touch with me here and by e-mail.

    Like

  5. prasad

    “there needs to be a facebook type of site for introverts. one where you can connect, but only selectively, rarely. insteading “friending” people, you could “acquaintance” people. ”
    Sounds like a nightmare! Imagine, extending the scheme, having to decide not just whether to friend someone but also whether she’s an acquaintance, friend, buddy, dear friend or best friend. The scope for friction and awkwardness would increase dramatically.

    Like

  6. narayan

    To my eye the sign is shaped like a dome, which discerning neighbors should recognize as associated more with Muslim architecture than (Hindu) temple architecture. I will search for Hindu temples that prove me wrong.

    Like

Leave a comment