Accidental Blogger

A general interest blog

  • Just over a year ago, I had brought the young Delhi artist, Richa Arora to the attention of A.B. readers. As I explained in the original post, Richa got my attention with her bold use of color, lines and angles.  Her abstract depiction of real life scenes with geometric precision is a style I find attractive. Richa has sent me the photos of her latest creations which I am again pleased to exhibit here. All the paintings are oil and acrylic on canvas. Be sure to click on the images for enlargement.  (Those  who began reading A.B. after March 2006, please check out Richa’s earlier works here.)

    From left to right: Bifold, Contours of Green, Reflection, Untitled

    Bifold Contours_of_green Reflection Untitled

                                                                                                                                                                                      

    Since Richa’s pictures first appeared here, I am happy to report that I have become the proud owner of one of the paintings originally featured on A.B.  So when I say that I like Richa’s work, you can rest assured that I have put my money where my mouth is. :-)

  • Readers will surely be aware that Ruchira and I haven’t been terribly impressed with Presidential hopeful John Edwards, particularly after the Amanda Marcotte fracas, in which Edwards hired Marcotte to run his official blog because she is a prominent liberal blogger, and then when the right-wing noise machine predictably complained "wah wah we don’t like liberals" he publicly berated her for "personally offensive" posts and then shortly thereafter "accepted her resignation"–i.e. he fired for for precisely the reason he hired her.

    So I’m pleasantly surprised to see that he actually has something intelligent to say pertaining to national security and the so-called "war on terror":

    Seeking to link poverty in other countries to U.S. national security,
    Edwards argued that militant extremists in nations torn apart by
    poverty and civil war have replaced government educational systems and
    are teaching young people to hate the United States.

    "When
    you understand that, it suddenly becomes clear: global poverty is not
    just a moral issue for the United States — it is a national security
    issue for the United States," he said at Saint Anselm College.

    "If
    we tackle it, we have the chance to change a generation of potential
    extremists and enemies into a generation of friends," Edwards said.

    Edwards
    called for spending $3 billion a year to extend primary education to
    millions of children in developing countries. Combating terrorism
    should begin in classrooms, not battlefields, he said.  [link]

    No surprise that Neil Sinhababu, an Edwards backer, is pleased. (That’s the perfunctory hat tip.) 

    So am I.  I also can’t help but wonder: is this the first intelligent thing any of the current Dems have said about the "global struggle against extremism" (or whatever the blazes the psychopaths running this country are now calling it)?  That’s crazy pre-9/11 thinking right there: Maybe, just maybe, we should stop to think about the causes of terrorism!

  • Those with young children, nieces, nephews, siblings or friends might find this useful .  Thanks to Andrea of Just One More Book for the link.

  • The Carnival of the Liberals # 34, The Ides of March is up at Brainshrub.

  • Ruchira and I have been volleying e-mail messages behind the scenes regarding a cluster of recent articles dealing with "science and …"—fill in the blank with a miscellany of topics you might not have expected to find associated with science just a decade or two ago: mens rea and "neurolaw," laughter, the weather of the next mega-annum… Neither of us is equipped with sufficient time to comment thoroughly on the subject, so instead I’ll do so cursorily and leave it up to readers and commenters to, well, fill in the blanks, if you so choose. 

    The New York Times recently ran a long story by Jeffrey Rosen on forensic neuroscience and the use of brain scans as legal evidence in a trial. It is a fascinating and extensive treatment of the subject, although it suffers occasionally from the "gee whiz!" tone that often plagues popular science writing.  (One of the protagonists, according to Rosen, "is a disciplined and quietly intense man, and his enthusiasm for the transformative power of neuroscience is infectious.") Despite the tone, the treatment of a controversial subject—the notion that if intention has a purely material causal explanation, then we shouldn’t be punishing people according to their intentions—is fair and balanced.

    (more…)

  • Thumbs_up_3 Thumbs_down_3                         

    I ought to be writing a substantive post about books (or something else). But I am just not feeling up to it. Instead, I decided to fill up blog space with some light weight (but hopefully not boring) observations about books I have read more than once.

    It is not often that I go back and re-read a book.  But there is a small number of books which have received my attention a second time – some because I wanted to read them again and others because my book club selected a book I had read a long time ago and I had to jog my memory.  All the books I list here to describe how they withstood the test of time, were first read in my teens or early twenties and revisited years and decades later. The experiences of a repeat read were varied for different books and sometimes they were surprising.  (Please feel free to chime in with your own experience of reading a book a second time.)

    Older and Newer Classics:

    Great Expectations, A Tale of Two Cities (Charles Dickens), Pygmalion (George Bernard Shaw), East of Eden (John Steinbeck), To Kill a Mocking Bird (Harper Lee):

    First round – mesmerising. Second time – equally electrifying. 

    My Antonia (Willa Cather), Ethan Frome (Edith Wharton), Pride and Prejudice (Jane Austen): 

    First round – good reading but somewhat rustic, frumpy and boring. Second time – stunningly beautiful for their astute, soulful and gentle insights that I recognized more fully in light of my mature perspective. 

    Gone with the Wind (Margaret Mitchell) : First round – a riveting account of love, romance, war and passion in an historic era (I was thirteen when I first read GWTW). Second time – melodramatic and somewhat soap operatic account of love, romance, war and passion in an historic era.

    War and Peace (Leo Tolstoy): Failed to go beyond 100 pages – both times! Now you know my secret. I am incapable of reading Tolstoy. Anna Karenina met with a similar fate but that I tried just once!

    Popular politics / philosophy:

    Darkness at Noon (Arthur Koestler): First read around age tweny two, repeated two decades later.  A polished gem both times around.

    Atlas Shrugged (Ayn Rand):  I had read three books by Ayn Rand in my late teens. Of these only Atlas Shrugged got a second look.

    First round: Growing up against a background of hypocritical parroting of touchy-feely and somewhat utopian sloganeering of Gandhian philosophy by Indian leaders and elders, Ms Rand seduced  with her "brave" individualism. Second time: With my adult appreciation of the simple, altruistic and cooperative spirit of Gandhianism (with which I don’t agree fully but that is a whole different post) and other liberal ideals, Ms Rand and her selfish, narcissistic and reactionary world view engendered revulsion and disdain.

    Catch 22 (Joseph Heller): This one was a stunner both times but for different reasons. 

    First round – made me laugh, made me cry and took me to seventh heaven. I loved the book. Second time – I started to read it recently after recommending it to my book club because I thought in view of Bush’s war, it would be fitting reading material. My friends, those who had never read it, loved it.  Amazingly enough, I myself felt oddly disconnected from Heller’s masterful grasp of absurd humor, human tragedy and satirical take on war.  I stopped reading after the first few chapters in order to preserve the memory of the euphoria I had felt when I first read it in my early twenties.  Not at all what I had expected from re-reading a book I still consider one of my favorites!

    Crime, suspense and mystery:

    This is one category which rarely lends itself to re-reading – when you know the ending, what’s the point? But I did revisit a few of the favorites of my youth for retro-enjoyment and because once I was in a situation where there was not much else to read. Here I will go by the authors rather than particular books. I have pretty much read everything that the following three wrote, starting around the age of eleven.

    Ian Fleming’s James Bond novels:  First round – thrilling and titillating high adventure. Second time – what a buffoon!

    Agatha Christie and Arthur Conan Doyle : Dame Agatha and Sir Arthur charmed both times across the span of decades.

    Apart from the books mentioned above, there are some other authors who have retained my admiration through the ages. Many are Bengali (my native tongue) writers unfamiliar (except perhaps, Tagore) to the majority of readers of A.B. Another not widely familiar author (to US readers) who still unfailingly holds my attention is P.G. Wodehouse. I wrote what probably qualifies as my most spontaneously joyous post  on A.B. about the incredible Wodehouse.  Oddly enough, one literary genre which still brings a smile to my adult  lips is Bengali children’s literature . This amazing and little known (outside the Bengali reading community) body of literary work probably qualifies as the most sophisticated children’s literature in the world. I know it sounds surprising. But take it from someone  whose reading  juices were tapped early for a life time of addiction by the delicious smorgasbord of Bengali kiddie lit.  I won’t prolong this particular discussion by digressing into that unfamiliar and hard to explain territory. Those who are interested, please read mine and other afficionados’ comments on Amardeep Singh’s excellent post on Bengali sci-fi and children’s writing.

    I don’t know if anything is to be deduced about the lasting value or innate quality of a book by measuring whether it delights once, twice or forever. If a book manages to give the reader enjoyment at the time it is read, for whatever reason, that I think is triumph enough.   

    Update: By sheer coincidence, I discovered this morning that this week’s Newsweek has an enjoyable article on boomer reading habits. Now that the oldest of baby boomers are turning sixty, Newsweek has been running a Boomer File of their cultural backdrop of humor, politics, music and literature. The boomer reading list in Newsweek, unlike mine, only includes iconic literary works published in the 1950s and 60s.   

  • I am happy to note that Leiter Reports, the influential philosophy / political blog is now also a "useful consumer" blog. Professor Bill Edmundson has a very funny  post on Philosophy beauty products there.

    Philosophy has long been stigmatized as a dry matter of logic-chopping and wheezy speculation.  A branding makeover was long overdue.  Where better to start than on the surface?   ("Save the appearances," and all that.)   Ergo, philosophy now has its own line of skin-care products:

    He should have added that Philosophy is also one of the more expensive lines of beauty products – not entirely in keeping with the "unkempt, unshaved, generally indifferent to appearance" image of the philosopher. I once used a face mask by Philosophy – it was offered as a bonus with some other purchase. It was good but not terribly superior to many other less expensive products. I wondered about the market research that was behind the brand name and its appeal to women who are the main targets of Philosophy skin care products. I bet they didn’t have Kant, Hegel, Spinoza and other "dry" western philosophers in mind. The idea I am sure was to evoke Zen, Yoga, Taoism and other warm and moist feeling tropical thoughts.

    After reading Professor Edmundson’s post, I went and took a look at the names of individual beauty aids marketed by Philosophy. With some amusement (and amazement) I mulled over the soulful appeal of names such as:

    • Hope, Hope and Prayer, When Hope is Not Enough
    • Grace, Purity, Pure Grace, Amazing Grace
    • Supernatural, Soul Owner, Jump Starter, Time on Your Hands, Eye Believe etc.

    Prodlg_00640660All the above are women’s creams, lotions, perfumes and balms. The only men’s cosmetic item I found (I didn’t go through all 184 products on the list) was a shaving cream with the intriguingly minimalistic name, The Common Man. What? No hope, prayer or jump start for the man who wants to polish up his exterior?  Then Professor Edmundson pointed me to a truly creepy combination of names for men’s Philosophy productsCommon Man + Amen = Policeman !  Make what you will of this sinister sounding word play.

  • A tragic and disturbing story from Norway.  Another bitter fruit of Nazi philosophy whose seeds are still scattered in the battered minds of its vicitms.

    Living hell of Norway’s ‘Nazi’ children

    In his tiny flat on the edge of Oslo, Paul Hansen shows me his family album. It doesn’t take long. He only has three photos. One picture shows Paul as a toddler, the other two – the mother who abandoned him – and the father he never knew.

    Paul was the product of a brief encounter between a Norwegian woman and a German soldier: a family history which was to make his life a living hell.

    "At the end of World War II, I was locked away in a mental home," Paul tells me.

    "Later I found out it was because I was the son of a German soldier. They called me a ‘Nazi brat’. But it wasn’t my fault I was born this way. Hitler, the war, none of it is my fault. I was just a child."

    It was Adolf Hitler’s henchman, Heinrich Himmler, who had encouraged liaisons between German troops and Norwegian women: part of his plan to breed an Aryan master race of blonde-haired, blue-eyed babies for the 1,000-year Reich. They were known as the Lebensborn (Fountain of Life) children and – after the war – they became targets for revenge. …

    Search for justice

    Once too ashamed to go public with their stories, now 150 war children are demanding justice.They have appealed to the European Court of Human Rights – accusing the Norwegian state of discrimination. As their stories of abuse were read out to the court, some of the former Lebensborn children sat in tears.

    Historian Lars Borgesrud was commissioned by the Norwegian government to research the war children’s stories. He has convinced they have suffered state discrimination.

    "Between 1946-1958 special rules and regulations in social laws were adopted, which actually excluded sections of war children and created poor economic conditions for these children."

    The full story here.

  • Ever felt that your husband/wife/significant other was too ready to debunk any of your suggestions?

    Here‘s
    a scientific study that proves that it’s true- so true that even the
    husband-wife pair who were the lead researchers couldn’t agree as to
    its conclusions. Now that would explain why my husband automatically dismisses what I say, so that I have to employ reverse psychology to get agreement with my actual opinions.

    And, if you wanted to find out why some ladies are just crankier than
    the others, just look to this recent investigation that prove that the genes have the answer. And to think that I was blaming my crankiness  on PMS ( and lack of sleep, and lack of me-time and noisy kids and undone chores and…)

    Last but not the least, a study which shows how people can be influenced by even obviously fake science by inserting pretty colored pictures of the brain and the mention of neuroscience.

    "In a recent study, Deena Skolnick, a graduate student at Yale, asked her subjects to judge different explanations of a psychological
    phenomenon. Some of these explanations were crafted to be awful. And
    people were good at noticing that they were awful—unless Skolnick
    inserted a few sentences of neuroscience. These were entirely
    irrelevant, basically stating that the phenomenon occurred in a certain
    part of the brain. But they did the trick: For both the novices and the
    experts (cognitive neuroscientists in the Yale psychology department),
    the presence of a bit of apparently-hard science turned bad
    explanations into satisfactory ones."

    Now, I’m confused about the earlier studies- To believe or not to believe, that is the question…

  • After the serious and involved backing and forthing on my recent post on superstitions, religious and otherwise, how’s this for some morbid humor?  [ link via Pharyngula ]

    Serbian vampire hunters have acted to prevent the very remote possibility that former dictator Slobodan Milosevic might stage a come-back – by driving a three-foot stake through his heart.

    According to Ananova, the politically-motivated Van Helsings, led by Miroslav Milosevic (no relation), gave themselves up to cops after attacking the deceased despot in his grave in the eastern town of Pozarevac.

    Miroslav Milosevic said "he and his fellow vampire hunters acted to stop the former dictator returning from the dead to haunt the country". His team explained that the wooden stake had been "driven into the ground and through the late president’s heart".

    Slobodan Milosevic’s Socialist Party of Serbia naturally condemned the desecration, while his daughter-in-law Milica Gajic said she "planned to sue the vampire hunters and accused the police of failing to protect the grave properly".

  • Anandpur_sahib_2_1 Shunya’s latest post about the Sikh Gurdwara (temple) Anandpur Sahib took me far down the memory lane. I had visited this beautiful place in my late teens. I don’t remember too many of the details now. But I did make a sketch of the lovely structure which amazingly is still in my possession (most of the art work that I had produced in India got inexplicably "lost" during one of our moves). It is a pen and pencil execution in a school note book whose pages are now yellowing. I am posting it here. Please do check out Shunya’s much better and vivid photographic depictions of this stunning place.

  • The recent article in New York Times magazine, Darwin’s God looking into the debate over religion and evolution has sparked energetic discussions on several science blogs. The question being asked by scientists (evolutionary biologists, cognitive scientists, anthropologists among others) revolves around two central points. Is human religiosity, superstition, belief in the supernatural and "hope beyond reason" an adaptive mental trait which confers an evolutionary advantage to humans as individuals and as groups?  Or is it a by-product of some other more essential evolutionary adaptation – a neurological accident?  Anthropologist Scott Atran is one of the scientists who has been at the forefront of this debate for some time. He, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris and many others who have spoken widely and publicly on religion are of the by-product school.

    When a trait is universal, evolutionary biologists look for a genetic explanation and wonder how that gene or genes might enhance survival or reproductive success. In many ways, it’s an exercise in post-hoc hypothesizing: what would have been the advantage, when the human species first evolved, for an individual who happened to have a mutation that led to, say, a smaller jaw, a bigger forehead, a better thumb? How about certain behavioral traits, like a tendency for risk-taking or for kindness?

    Atran saw such questions as a puzzle when applied to religion. So many aspects of religious belief involve misattribution and misunderstanding of the real world. Wouldn’t this be a liability in the survival-of-the-fittest competition? To Atran, religious belief requires taking “what is materially false to be true” and “what is materially true to be false.” …

    Hardships of early human life favored the evolution of certain cognitive tools, among them the ability to infer the presence of organisms that might do harm, to come up with causal narratives for natural events and to recognize that other people have minds of their own with their own beliefs, desires and intentions. Psychologists call these tools, respectively, agent detection, causal reasoning and theory of mind.

    According to the article, all the above three play a role in human religiosity and belief in God (and other supernaturals). The excellent NYT article is eleven pages long and looks at these questions from several angles – adaptation, by-product, individual or group trait etc.  Please do read if you have the time.  I am not about to argue the validity of any of the above claims put forward by various scientists. What is more fascinating to me is that if our religiosity indeed is an evolutionary trait, adaptive or otherwise, why have some humans through history had no use for religion despite enormous social pressures – sometimes at the risk of endangering their lives? In this group belong the atheists, the agnostics, the skeptics and those who just couldn’t care less about the religious question. Among those who claim to have faith, what percentage really has a deep seated belief system that flies in the face of their rational thinking?  How many go along with the herd mentality as the path of least resistance absorbing it as second nature without a second thought because religious training is usually inculcated early in childhood by those whom we see as infallible at that age, namely parents and family elders? I suspect that the vast majority of religious folks fall in this category of the obedient. Their belief and non-belief are dictated by the prevailing social / political norm without much mental energy spent on the question. And then there are the devoutly religious whose education, training and social milieu of reason and rationality ought to make them skeptical of and averse to counterintuitive dogmas and falsification of observed phenomena. It is the last group which confounds me the most and leads me to believe that perhaps there is indeed a genetic propensity towards "unquestioning faith" which expresses itself more strongly in some than others.  Perhaps the religious trait is nothing other than the by-product of the trait of self preservation in adversity, a belief in the unverifiable which provides succor when we are faced with unhappiness, failure, disease and death. There are no atheists in the foxhole, goes the conventional wisdom. It is like magic.

    A recent event has been on my mind for some time.  It is relevant to bring it up in the above context. I rarely discuss personal matters on the blog. I did however write one somewhat personal piece a while ago when I recounted my experience with Terence who was a student of mine in the Adult Literacy Program many years ago.  Terence was a drop out from the mainstream society. His inability to cope with the world at large was the result of his socio-economic disadvantage and inadequate exposure to rigorous education. Today, I will recount the story of another student of mine, "P.G.," who too is a drop out of sorts but whose life situation was diametrically opposite of Terence’s. P.G. came from a well off family, was highly educated, thoroughly competent and had been exposed to rational minded teachers (including me) since childhood.

    A couple of months ago another ex-student of mine, R.B., found my blog through a random search and contacted me via email. We reminisced a bit about the years when I was their young chemistry teacher and they were my energetic teenage pupils. His was a particularly bright batch of students some of whom have kept in touch with me over the years both in the US and in India. I queried R.B. about some of his ex-classmates, among them P.G. (now a man in his forties).  P.G. too had contacted me almost twenty years ago when he came to do his Ph. D. in the US. We stayed in touch over several years right through his tenure as a post doc and then abruptly we had lost touch. This is what R.B. wrote back.

    P.G.?  How come you are not aware of him?  He is currently a spiritual leader in the US and also travels all over Europe giving discourses on Hinduism, Vedanta etc. He has been renamed [name removed]. Below are a few of his current snaps and links. As far as I recollect, after his mother passed away, he separated from his wife, and vanished. He did finish his Ph.D, also got job offers, but decided to contribute towards society spiritually rather than materially.

    Here is the link [link removed] that R.B. sent describing the latest whereabouts of P.G. as also the photo [image removed] of his current incarnation. I was astounded to say the least.  It is worth noting that P.G. was very intelligent – one of my best students. He studied chemistry in Delhi University, got his Ph.D with Nobel Laureate Paul Lauterbur (of MRI fame) at U of Illinois, got married and went on to pursue post doctoral research at Caltech when he "disappeared." Until his disappearance, he used to stay in touch with me quite regularly. I had already become somewhat aware of his "weirdness" and even exchanged a few harsh words when I felt he was pressuring me to lend credence to some of his outlandish and illogical claims that defied logic. This latest revelation is the first time I have heard of him in nearly a decade.

    I taught P.G. for six years when he was between 12 and 18 years of age. I thought I knew him well.  Yet how little did I know.  Strangely enough, after all these years I still recognize the somber and serious young man who was one of my brightest students, through the heavily bearded visage of the yogi. But I doubt that P.G. and I will have much to say to each other if we met again. We inhabit different worlds. I would have very much liked to hear in his own words the precipitating event for the transformation. Or was it an inevitable outcome waiting to happen due to evolutionary reasons, his religious gene programmed to turn on and lead him down a different fork in the path than I would have envisaged for him?  It is worth noting that P.G.’s expertise was in an interdisciplinary field of biophysics and neuroscience.  Up until the cross over to the spiritual realm, he was involved in rigorous peer reviewed scientific research.

    Note: The title of the post is partially borrowed from a quip made by my co-blogger Dean.

    Update: This post has been modified since its original publication.

  • Only the Eyes are Mine:  At the very beginning of Usha Alexander’s debut novel, Sita, the central character makes the quiet observation described in the title of the book. Looking at herself in the mirror when she is old and sick, she glances back at her whole life lived on two continents and recognizing nothing of her youthful self, Sita declares, "Only the eyes are mine."  I am not sure what the author meant to convey in this sentence. To me, it meant that no matter what the travails, disappointments and compromises of the life lived, if we can look back with clarity and take its true measure, we can be at peace with ourselves.

    Only the Eyes are Mine is the story of Sita, spanning the long journey from her illiterate and poor girlhood in a small town in South India to a relatively sophisticated and comfortable old age in San Francisco, USA.  Sita was a master weaver in her youth, dazzling customers with her artistry and adventurous leaps of fancy at the loom. Alexander tells Sita’s story much in the same spirit. She weaves the circumstances of Sita’s complex life and her secrets over the length of the book until a fuller picture emerges. The story line moves back and forth between the present and the past – between her new home and the old.

    In the middle of her life, Sita moves to the US at her brother Babu’s request when she finds herself alone in India. After the sudden death of Babu’s wife in an accident, she assumes the role of a surrogate mother to his children, Meera and Ravi. She is a perfect guardian for her motherless wards, patient, comforting and attentive to their needs while hiding some terrible secrets of her own.

    The impending wedding of her niece Meera to a "suitable" Indian doctor is the backdrop of the novel. Sita and Babu are elated with the match and see a bright future for their niece / daughter with the ambitious and successful young man. Meera goes along with the "arrangement" at the behest of her elders. Her own younger brother Ravi has doubts about the decision as do some of her close friends. Meera too feels some anxiety but keeps it hidden from her family. During the run up to the wedding, the story unfolds through Sita’s ruminations on her past life. She is transported to the days of her own marriage as a child bride. We learn the details of her coming of age, her unorthodox married life and her passion for weaving which becomes a substitute for other unfulfilled desires. We also see her anger, bitterness and frustrations that subsequently lead her down a reckless path of several broken social taboos, one of them quite unforgivable, in my opinion. Sita’s decisions to flout custom and convention lead finally to an inevitable tragedy. Although the event is never again mentioned by her or others, Sita must live with its memory for the rest of her life.

    It is interesting to note that Meera’s father and aunt want her to have a predictable and safe life which both see as a prescription for "happiness." Yet both elders, particularly Sita, made some rather dangerous and unconventional choices in search of their own happiness. The author, born and brought up in the US of Indian parents and currently living in the San Francisco area, paints a far more convincing picture of life in rural south India than she does of the local American scene which remains pallid in comparison. Sita is the central figure in the novel and she remains so through out the narrative. The author focuses on her and so do we. The numerous other characters that surround her or float in and out of the story appear a bit two dimensional – their angst, aspirations and desperation do not etch the reader’s mind as deeply as Sita’s tribulations.

    Only the Eyes are Mine is a book about a willful woman struggling to define herself in her own eyes – through her art, her relationships and in the end as a peacemaker within her surrogate family. At a secondary level, it is also the age old story of striking a fine balance between roots and wings that all older folks must carefully weigh when it comes to their children’s lives. Our children surely are symbols of our hope but they are not the vessels for realizing our unfulfilled dreams. Their eyes too are their own.

  • A curious French connection for the weekend: Balthazar Napolean de Bourbon, a lawyer/farmer in Bhopal, India, has been identified as possibly being in line for the lost throne of the Bourbon royal family of France.
    He is not hugely interested in pressing his claim, though it may earn him a trip to Paris and a few other perks of a passport with the name Bourbon on it:

    100pxfranceroyale_1 "Balthazar Napoleon de Bourbon, a jovial Indian lawyer and part-time farmer, has always been fascinated by France. Framed pictures of the Eiffel Tower and the palace of Versailles implausibly decorate his house in a dusty, bustling suburb of the central Indian city of Bhopal. He gave his children French names even though he has never set foot in France.

    But he may soon make his first trip to Paris, after he was visited by a relative of Prince Philip, who told him that he is the first in line to the lost French throne…..

    From his home in the Bhopal suburbs, Mr Bourbon, 48, said he would be glad to take a DNA test, but remained stoical about the "hypothetical question" of whether he was heir to the throne. Conscious of the bloody outcome for royals in France, he felt royal status could bring "trouble", not to mention questions from skeptical historians.

    Still, he has long had a brass plaque above his front door reading "House of Bourbon" with the fleur-de-lis crest of the French monarchy. His wife runs the neighbouring school for local children, called the Bourbon school. The family is Catholic and keeps Bourbon relics, including a sword, in their home. He said he felt "a sense of pride" when contemplating the picture of Versailles on his wall.

    But he is aware that his family’s fortunes waned in Bhopal long ago. He describes the Indian branch of the family as Bourbons on the rocks.

    "From the day I was born, I was made to understand that I belonged to the family of the Bourbons," he said.

    "I may be from a royal family but I live my life as a commoner. I didn’t have time to learn French as a teenager because my father’s death meant I had to work to look after my mother and sisters. Life has been very tough for me."

    "When his sister went to France on holiday she visited a castle once owned by Bourbon kings. It was closed to the public but she showed her Indian passport with the Bourbon name and was allowed in."-  The Guardian.

  • With a background in electronics hardware, I had always been fascinated by the Bathtub curve, which is a model for a typical hardware product life-cycle from infancy to death. Today, it struck me as a good analogy of the U.S. Military and their readiness and ability to be effective.

    (more…)