Accidental Blogger

A general interest blog

  • Forget Tom DeLay, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michelle Malkin and Ann Coulter.  Forget the bellicosity and taunts emanating from the White House occupied by Bush, Cheney and Rove. Forget Fox News and the barb filled rhetoric of right wing religious zealots. According to George Bush Senior, the adversarial political climate in the country has been made worse by bloggers. Here is an excerpt of an interview by Fox News Channel’s Greta Von Susteren with the Bush parents.

    GRETA: Why do you think it’s gotten so adversarial? …….

    H.W. BUSH: It’s true but that’s not new really. I mean, you go back in history and you’ll find that there was always adversarial politics. There was always gut fighting. And it’s probably a little worse now given the electronic media and the bloggers and all these kinds of things. But I don’t despair about it. I think things — there is a pendulum at work at times so you swing away from the incivility back to more normal climate.

    Actually, in my opinion, Bush Senior’s criticism of bloggers was not as egregious as what Fox News had to say about liberal blogs.  Perhaps Greta should have played a clip from this video to really rile him up.

  • Sen.-elect James Webb holds the combat boots of his son, who is stationed in Iraq. Webb wore the boots during his campaign to draw attention to his criticism of the handling of the Iraq war. With him are Gov. Timothy M. Kaine (D), from left, Webb's wife, Hong Le Webb, and Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.).

    (Jim Webb holding up the combat boots of his son who is serving in Iraq during a victory rally. He wore his son’s boots throughout his senatorial campaign: Image from Washington Post)

    I have taken a particularly keen interest in the campaign of Jim Webb during the past election season. I didn’t know much about Webb until he caught the nation’s and my own attention due to the "macaca" gaffe by his opponent, Senator George Allen. Because of that incident, Webb became one of four political candidates who received campaign contributions from me this year.  Also, it was heartening to see a pro-military man whose own son is serving in Iraq, speak out forcefully against the war there.

    What I knew about Webb until now is that he was a conservative man who had served in conservative administrations. He comes from a military family, was Ronald Reagan’s Navy secretary and used to be an angry Vietnam veteran. Webb’s anger was different from John Kerry’s.  Webb believed that veterans such as Kerry who protested the war, betrayed their fellow soldiers. Webb was in fact a soldier in the mold of John O’Neill, the leader of the Swift Boat veterans. He had once refused to shake Kerry’s hand. I was therefore greatly and pleasantly surprised when I came across this op-ed piece by Webb in the Wall Street Journal. In it he sounds like a man after my heart. If he truly sees things this way, I expect him to be a positive influence on the Democratic side of the senate where Trojan Horses like Lieberman will be lurking.

    Class Struggle
    American workers have a chance to be heard.


    BY JIM WEBB
    Wednesday, November 15, 2006 12:01 a.m. EST

    The most important–and unfortunately the least debated–issue in politics today is our society’s steady drift toward a class-based system, the likes of which we have not seen since the 19th century. America’s top tier has grown infinitely richer and more removed over the past 25 years. It is not unfair to say that they are literally living in a different country. Few among them send their children to public schools; fewer still send their loved ones to fight our wars. They own most of our stocks, making the stock market an unreliable indicator of the economic health of working people. The top 1% now takes in an astounding 16% of national income, up from 8% in 1980. The tax codes protect them, just as they protect corporate America, through a vast system of loopholes.

    Incestuous corporate boards regularly approve compensation packages for chief executives and others that are out of logic’s range. As this newspaper has reported, the average CEO of a sizeable corporation makes more than $10 million a year, while the minimum wage for workers amounts to about $10,000 a year, and has not been raised in nearly a decade. When I graduated from college in the 1960s, the average CEO made 20 times what the average worker made. Today, that CEO makes 400 times as much.

    In the age of globalization and outsourcing, and with a vast underground labor pool from illegal immigration, the average American worker is seeing a different life and a troubling future. Trickle-down economics didn’t happen. Despite the vaunted all-time highs of the stock market, wages and salaries are at all-time lows as a percentage of the national wealth. At the same time, medical costs have risen 73% in the last six years alone. Half of that increase comes from wage-earners’ pockets rather than from insurance, and 47 million Americans have no medical insurance at all.

    Manufacturing jobs are disappearing. Many earned pension programs have collapsed in the wake of corporate "reorganization." And workers’ ability to negotiate their futures has been eviscerated by the twin threats of modern corporate America: If they complain too loudly, their jobs might either be outsourced overseas or given to illegal immigrants.

    This ever-widening divide is too often ignored or downplayed by its beneficiaries. A sense of entitlement has set in among elites, bordering on hubris. When I raised this issue with corporate leaders during the recent political campaign, I was met repeatedly with denials, and, from some, an overt lack of concern for those who are falling behind. A troubling arrogance is in the air among the nation’s most fortunate. Some shrug off large-scale economic and social dislocations as the inevitable byproducts of the "rough road of capitalism." Others claim that it’s the fault of the worker or the public education system, that the average American is simply not up to the international challenge, that our education system fails us, or that our workers have become spoiled by old notions of corporate paternalism."

    There is more. Looks like Webb is an opinionated man. He is talking the straight talk that I want Democratic leaders to echo.  Will he now also walk the walk?  I hope so. He sure has a sturdy pair of boots!

  • Welcome to the Devout Nation.  We are repeatedly reminded by the religious faithfuls that the freedom of religion and worship are basic human rights.  Many would interpret that freedom to include all religions and even the right not to believe. However, that interpretation predicates that we may be dealing with rational people. But the problem with smug and dogmatic faith is that it does not make room for freedom of thought – it inevitably comes down to "my way or the highway."

    Until now, our elected leaders have been prone to expressing ecstasic gratitude for their "Judeo-Christian" values which guide them through the trials and tribulations of governing the greatest nation on earth. But now Americans who fall outside that definition of American faith, are entering the political arena and soon they too might start defining statesmanship through the prism of their religious beliefs.  That realization is not sitting very well with some — although fairness demands that what is sauce for the goose ought to be sauce for the gander. Until candidates bold enough to run on the platform of rationality and reason start winning American elections, we will have to put up with the melodramatic display of religiosity  by politicians, especially when they are pandering to the religious majority.  But what about those who belong to minority faiths – the Hindus, the Mormons, the Sikhs (I am leaving out the Jews. They are included in the Judeo part of Judeo-Christian) and the most troubling of all in the current political climate, the Muslims? How comfortable are Americans going to be with public display of faith when the faith displayed does not fit the definition of "home grown?"  Here are two recent examples of how some might react. I am sure more such indignant and suspicious outbursts will follow.

    "Sen. Satveer Chaudhary, a practicing Hindu, was re-elected in District 50 [of Minnesota state legislature] last week. Rather than call, his Christian opponent Rae Hart Anderson offered him an e-mail concession that he said read more like a sermon. The following is the text of that e-mail message.

    Congratulations on winning the District 50 senate race. Your phone is "busy"…no doubt with good wishes!

    I’ve enjoyed much of this race, especially the people I’ve met…even you! I see your deficits–not all of them, and your potential–but not all of it. Only your Creator knows the real potential He’s put in you. Get to know Him and know yourself…you’ll be more interesting even to you!

    The race of your life is more important than this one–and it is my sincere wish that you’ll get to know Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. He died for the sins of the world, yours and mine–and especially for those who accept His forgiveness. His kingdom will come and His will be done–on earth as it is in heaven. There’s more….I love belonging to the family of God. Jesus is the way, the truth and offers His life to you and each human being. Pay attention…this is very important, Satveer. Have you noticed Jesus for yourself…at some moment in time, yet???

    ….You could invite Him to make the race of your life ‘eternal’. God waits to be gracious to each person that knows they need to be forgiven. Do you? I think you do. Just ask. Christ won eternal life for you and said so. Take Him at His Word. Take some time to get acquainted with this power-filled Jesus…God with us. You could be a temple of the living God, by invitation—yours, TO GOD. :) There’s nothing like belonging to Christ…not winning, not money, not degrees…it’s the best.

    Good wishes and better wishes…until you wish for the best!

    Rae Hart Anderson

    Read the full text of the email from Anderson to Chaudhary here.

    Then there is the case of Keith Ellison, also from Minnesota, the first Muslim ever to be elected to the US Congress. Ellison was interrogated by the right wing hack Glenn Beck on CNN Headline News about his religious affiliation and loyalty (or lack thereof) to America. 

    BECK: History was made last Tuesday when Democrat Keith Ellison got elected to Congress, representing the great state of Minnesota. Well, not really unusual that Minnesota would elect a Democrat. What is noteworthy is that Keith is the first Muslim in history to be elected to the House of Representatives. He joins us now.

    Congratulations, sir.

    ELLISON: How you doing, Glenn? Glad to be here.

    BECK: Thank you. I will tell you, may I — may we have five minutes here where we’re just politically incorrect and I play the cards face up on the table?

    ELLISON: Go there.

    BECK: OK. No offense, and I know Muslims. I like Muslims. I’ve been to mosques. I really don’t believe that Islam is a religion of evil. I — you know, I think it’s being hijacked, quite frankly.

    With that being said, you are a Democrat. You are saying, "Let’s cut and run." And I have to tell you, I have been nervous about this interview with you, because what I feel like saying is, "Sir, prove to me that you are not working with our enemies."

    Links to this story via Sepia Mutiny.

  • The most regrettable waste of my twenty dollars happened last Saturday evening when my husband and I unwittingly went to see the movie, "Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan."  Why unwitting?  Because of reviews such as these.  Most misleading perhaps was David Ansen of Newseek, with whom I agree nine out of ten times. He gave it a glowing review. Even though I knew what the movie was about and to expect immature scatological humor and gross nudity, Ansen made the movie sound hilarious, scathing and smart. Well, it was none of these. I can bear some amount of juvenile humor and unnecessary nudity but I can’t sit through boring. And this movie was a crashing bore – at least for my taste.

    In Borat, Sacha Baron Cohen apparently set out to make some clever points about America, none of them flattering.  Well, I guess I was already aware of those shortcomings and didn’t need to see this stupid movie to be educated. I don’t have HBO, so I am not familiar with Ali G., the other comic character in whose guise Cohen is known to the viewing public. As Borat, he is nowhere near either Richard Pryor or John Cleese with whom he has been favorably compared.  The only truly funny scene in the entire movie is the rodeo scene where Borat attempts to entertain a patriotic crowd. The most chilling scene is when Borat asks a gun dealer about the best weapon and ammunition with which to kill a Jew and the dealer calmly proceeds with his recommendations. (But he didn’t sell him a gun because Borat lacked a permit – the system worked.) As most of you know by now, the majority of the movie’s jokes are at the expense of unwitting folks who thought they were helping a genuinely hapless foreigner. Now that the movie is out and Borat is making oodles of money at the box office, some of them are miffed. I don’t blame them.  Halfway through the picture I was so irritated with the mindless antics of the Borat character, I was wondering why no one had taken a well aimed swing at his jaw.  Well I am pleased to report that finally, someone did.

    Update: Now here is a review I wish I had read before I wasted my time and money on this worthless movie.  The reviewer echoes my opinion which in a nutshell reads: "Borat is NOT funny even when you get all the jokes!"  (Thanks Confused, for the pointer.)

  • The recent Democratic win in the mid-term elections has had a strange, dampening effect on my desire to blog about political matters.  It is almost as if the chief impetus to write is gone and that it is now time to wait and see. In the past week, serious considerations of closing down A.B. has crossed my mind a few times. (Look now for more cultural and literary commentary.)  I didn’t realize how deep my anger with the Bush administration was and how much it was fueling my blogging energy.  It is a bit scary!

    It is also funny because this is more or less what I was waiting for – for six long years.  To see the worst and the most dangerous administration in recent American history defanged and brought under control. Yet, I look at the new Democrat controlled Congress with some trepidation and anxiety. Not all newly elected members come bearing the message I wish to hear. The Bush 43 administration too will now be under new management which is really the old management of the Bush 41 administration. So on the whole, it looks like we took two steps ahead and at least one backwards. 

    Let us first examine the changes that the White House will be forced to make in the wake of the humiliation at the polls. Gone are the "in your face," arrogant  neo cons whose dream of world domination through American military might has been shattered or at least put on hold by the tragic and frightening debacle in Iraq.  Those who haven’t yet got the heave-ho, like Rove and Cheney, will most likely spend the remaining two years licking their wounds although I wouldn’t count Rove out until he is truly gone.  The new team in charge of national security is being put together by Poppy Bush’s friend and fellow Houstonian, James Baker, the unflappable aristocrat and diplomat with the icy smile. Daddy’s old confidante  will now put the leash on the wayward son of his friend whose feckless ways he was familiar with but whom he still worked hard to put at the helm of the most powerful nation on earth. Should we then trust him and his rescue team?  Those who put personal loyalties above the good of the nation? This new group of old hands are being widely hailed as "pragmatists and realists" about national security and foreign policy. What does that mean?  After all, they didn’t foresee the break up of the Soviet Union or the unfolding chaos in the Balkans. They were incredibly cozy with the Saudis, Kuwaitis and assorted monarchs and dictators, including Saddam Hussein. They paid little or no heed to the most crucial problem in the middle east – the Israeli Palestinian issue. The real difference between them and Bush-Cheney is that they didn’t go into Baghdad to topple Saddam Hussein after the 1991 invasion of Iraq. Instead they tried to starve the Iraqis with sanctions. To me that seems more like opportunism and cynicism rather than "realism" which implies some degree of wisdom. So I guess under the stewardship of the "neo-realists," Dubya’s itchy trigger finger will be kept under check in case he gets it into his head  to undertake regime change in another country like Iraq.  Instead, we will attack smaller, more defenseless countries with negligible military power like Panama and Grenada. (Take note, Venezuela and Nicaragua.)  Thank goodness for small mercies.

    I will hold my fire on the matter of the new Democratic Congress for the time being. Let us see how they conduct themselves in the next two years. Whether they will strengthen their hands for years to come or fritter away their energies with petty bickering on domestic policies and craven caving in on national security. Will they turn our attention back to bread and butter issues like minimum wage, job creation, access to education and health care? Can they inject some rationality and decency in the national dialogue which rises above petty issues of race, religion and parochialism? Will they be brave enough to state clearly that our morality and ethics do not equate to quoting the scriptures or wrapping ourselves in the flag?  That compassion does not equal pandering?  Instead of just nickel and dime retail politics of small gains, will the Democratic leadership be bold enough to put together ambitious national projects to benefit ALL Americans (universal health care and insurance?) and have a convincing message to sell it? Will they learn their lessons about national security from George McGovern and Howard Dean who advocate going to war only when we are attacked or our national security is truly threatened?  Or will they follow the lead of Madeleine Albright who wanted to attack "somebody" just because we have the best military in the world and to prove that she was "man" enough to take us to battle? Will we now turn our attention to Darfur, Congo and the poverty in Africa?  Or will our foreign policy consist mostly of striking lucrative trade and outsourcing deals with China and India? ? Can they assure us that they will try "honestly" to solve the mideast problem without waging unnecessary wars under the guise of "security" for Israel?  And will the Democrats work for a solution in Iraq which first and foremost, takes into consideration the future of the Iraqi people and not just some ill defined "victory" for Americans? Most of all, can the Democrats unite and lead our country in a direction in which "American Pride" signifies progressive and innovative endeavors in science, technology, education and equitable social services, rather than Red, White & Blue jingoism during war and the Olympic games?   

    I hope the Democrats succeed. I hope that with success will come the confidence to be bold. Boldness in time may give rise to vision and statesmanship.  But that may be too starry eyed. As my co-blogger Dean, gently reminded me in his comment, "politics is for politicians" and I must learn to live with that unremarkable fact.  Perhaps I will – as long as Americans never again foolishly elect and empower incompetent and dangerous leaders like Bush and Cheney.

  • And now for some fluff after all those intense pre- and post-election ruminations.

    A quote from a dissatisfied tester of  the latest innovation to chase age away , all for the paltry sum of $79/- only!!  Be sure to read the whole article here, it will have you in splits!

    ‘Thank goodness I work from home so no one can see me (forget the lady with the veil: put a classroom assistant in a face bra for a day and watch a room full of primary school children develop a lifelong phobia of bandages).’

  • Only, this one is three years old.

    "Regimes without checks and balances are prone to grave miscalculations."

                                                       __  Donald Rumsfeld, September 10, 2003

  • What a week! Garrulous though I usually am, I am feeling a bit tongue tied. So, rather than blather aimlessly, I will link to an AP article which reports reactions to past week’s US mid-term elections from around the world. Not just Americans are feeling liberated by Bush’s thumpin’ at the ballot box. Much of the rest of the world too is breathing a sigh of relief. While there is widespread jubilation, some anxiety remains about the unsettled situation in Iraq and how the Democrats will handle it. Countries like China, who are singlemindedly focused on the bottom line, are anxious about trade because Democrats are looked upon as protectionists and sticklers for labor and human rights.

    "The end of a six-year nightmare for the world."

    The seismic shift that midterm elections brought to Washington’s political landscape was welcomed by many Wednesday in a world sharply opposed to the war in Iraq and outraged over the harsh methods the Bush administration has employed in fighting terrorism.

       From Paris to Pakistan, politicians, analysts and ordinary citizens said they hoped the Democratic takeover of the House of Representatives would force President Bush to adopt a more conciliatory approach to global crises, and teach a president many see as a "cowboy" a lesson in humility.

        But some also expressed fears that a split in power and a lame-duck president might stall global trade talks and weaken much-needed American influence. On Iraq, some feared that Democrats will force a too-rapid retreat, leaving that country and the region in chaos.

        Regardless of the effect on world events, global giddiness that Bush was finally handed a political black-eye was almost palpable.

        In an extraordinary joint statement, more than 200 Socialist members of the European Parliament hailed the American election results as "the beginning of the end of a six-year nightmare for the world" and gloated that they left the Bush administration "seriously weakened."

        In London’s Guardian newspaper, commentator Martin Kettle wrote: "The cheering can be heard not just in America itself but around the planet."

        In Paris, expatriates and French citizens alike packed the city’s main American haunts to watch results, with some standing to cheer or boo as vote tabulations came in. One Frenchman, teacher Jean-Pierre Charpemtrat, 53, said it was about time U.S. voters figured out what much of the rest of the world already knew. "Americans are realizing that you can’t found the politics of a country on patriotic passion and reflexes," he said. "You can’t fool everybody all the time – and I think that’s what Bush and his administration are learning today."

        In Venezuela, President Hugo Chavez said the Democrats won the election thanks to a "reprisal vote."

        People across the Mideast also reacted swiftly, saying it appeared the U.S. president had paid the price for what many view as failed policy in Iraq. Even some Iraqis voiced hope for change. "We hope American foreign policy will change and that living conditions in Iraq will improve," said 48-year-old engineer Suheil Jabar, a Shiite Muslim in Baghdad.

        In Copenhagen, Denmark, 35-year-old Jens Langfeldt said he did not know much about the midterm elections but was opposed to Bush’s values. He referred to the president as "that cowboy."

        In Sri Lanka, some said they hoped the rebuke would force Bush to abandon a unilateral approach to global issues. The Democratic win means "there will be more control and restraint" over U.S. foreign policy. said Jehan Perera, a political analyst.

        Passions were even higher in Pakistan, where Bush is deeply unpopular despite billions in aid and support for President Gen. Pervez Musharraf. One opposition lawmaker, Hafiz Hussain Ahmed, said he welcomed the election result but hoped for more. Bush "deserves to be removed, put on trial and given a Saddam-like death sentence," he said.

        But while the result clearly produced more jubilation than jitters, there were deep concerns.

        Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen told broadcaster TV2 he hoped that the president and the new Congress would find "common ground on questions about Iraq and Afghanistan." "The world needs a vigorous U.S.A.," Fogh Rasmussen said.

         Some also worried that Democrats, who have a reputation for being more protective of U.S. jobs going overseas, will make it harder to achieve a global free trade accord.

        In China, some feared the resurgence of the Democrats would increase tension over human rights and trade and labor issues. China’s surging economy has a massive trade surplus with the United States.  "The Democratic Party … will protect the interests of small and medium American enterprises and labor and that could produce an impact on China-U.S. trade relations," Zhang Guoqing of the state-run Chinese Academy of Social Sciences said in a report on Sina.com, a popular Chinese Internet portal.

  • And it looks like the "macaca" too has been dislodged in Virginia.  So I should be euphoric and laughing.  At last the brake has been applied to the arrogant Bush administration’s reckless juggernaut.  Rumsfeld resigned (was fired?).  George Bush admitted sheepishly that the election results were a thumpin’.  I have waited for six years to see the cocky smile wiped off Bush’s face. At last it has happened. But why have I not been able to bring myself to write about the elections for more than thirty six hours, whereas every mischief by Bush-Cheney sends my fingers flying? (Time to close down Accidental Blogger ?) More about that a bit later.

    First, an account of my day as an election worker. Instead of just campaigning from the outside, this year I decided to work as an election official in my neighborhood precinct.  I am happy to report that everything went swimmingly well. It was an amazing experience although quite tiring.  I worked non-stop for twelve hours. The two precinct chairs were at it for sixteen hours.  In the end, five of us (all women) did a neat and clean job of verifying and signing in voters, helping with the e-slate (our county had write -in candidates on the Republican ballot) tallying votes, printing and reporting results, folding down the electronic voting machines and locking them up in the "cage."  (They are heavy!) No irregularities occured and all the numbers matched up perfectly. The closest we came to iffy behavior was when one guy with a loud voice and blustering attitude ambled in and declared that he had turned up early to vote so that the "communists" don’t take over the country. Since there were no official communist candidates on the ballot, we couldn’t fault him for illegal electioneering. But his reactionary behavior was soon balanced out by another man who came in to vote in a t-shirt which read, "The Worst President in History", with George Bush’s mug shot emblazoned on it. Because Bush too was not on the ballot, we let it go without comment.

    I am happy to report that of the two candidates for whom I actively campaigned (phone bank, block walking), Congressman Nick Lampson won handily to take Tom DeLay’s seat in the US congress. This was the biggest monkey off my own back because I have fruitlessly campaigned for every challenger to DeLay since moving to Texas and saw each of them lose. The Hammer used to have a vise like grip on the voters of Distict 22 in Texas – until his recent inglorious downfall. And now my district has a Democrat in Congress for the first time in decades. Unfortunately, Neeta Sane my neighbor, for whom too I campaigned quite diligently and who ran a great campaign for the county treasurer’s office on a Democratic ticket, lost.  But Neeta now has a campaign base and name and face recognition. She is incredibly hardworking, competent and vivacious. I hope she will run again for elected office and win the next time. Perhaps Neeta will for now take up a position in our neighborhood homeowners’ association which is inexorably turning into an incompetent bunch of "Yard & Curbside Nazis!"

    So much has happened since election day – some of it we expected and others we had only hoped for. The Democrats now control both houses of congress, with a comfortable lead in the House of Representatives and a razor thin edge in the Senate – 51 to 49. Democratic wins in states like Montana (crew cut won, corruption lost), Missouri (Michael J. Fox won and Rush Limbaugh lost) and Virginia (clearly the bigot lost) were as exciting as they were unexpected. 

    Of the ballot initiatives nationwide, raising the minimum wage won handily everywhere it was featured. So did the ban on gay marriage, in six out of seven states which voted on this measure.  The only state to vote it down was Arizona. Colorado voted for the ban inspite of Rev. Ted Haggard and his methamphetamine fueled gay sexual liasons. South Dakota voted down the proposed draconian ban on abortion. An impressive majority of state gubernatorial races were won by Democrats. A black man is the governor of Massachussetts. Democrat Deval Patrick became the second African American to be elected governor of a state after Douglas Wilder of Virginia.  A woman is going to be the Speaker of the House for the first time in US history. Nancy Pelosi, who was vilified by right wingers and held up as the quintessential lefty liberal to fear by the likes of Limbaugh and Hannity, will be third in line to be president.  With all the congressional committees now in Democratic hands, perhaps investigations of the misdeeds of the Bush administration will begin in earnest, including the shenanigans involved in the run up to the illegal Iraqi invasion. Even though Nancy Pelosi has said that impeachment is off the table, I expect she won’t stand in the way of subpoenas flying left and right. A mixed bag of good and not so good. Mostly good — if you are a Democrat.

    Although I feel a great sense of relief, I am far from euphoric. Why?  Because this election was all about what Americans are "against" but not necessarily what they are "for."  It was a vote against incompetence, arrogance, corruption and divisive partisanship. It was against the gross mismanagement of Katrina and the disaster in Iraq.  It was against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Rove. But of these, only Rummy is gone. Bush and Cheney remain at the helm. Karl Rove’s attack machine remains well oiled and purring. The 51- 49 Democratic majority in the Senate includes Joe Lieberman who is going to extract his revenge on his Democratic colleagues for not supporting him during his contentious "Independent" race against Ned Lamont. I heard him tell Sean Hannity that he will "remember" who his friends are (they happen to be mostly Republicans).  Lieberman is a hypocritical and selfish neo-con.  I am afraid that he may turn out to be a traitorous Zell Miller in the making who will stab the Dems in the back unless they facilitate his right wing agenda sufficiently. And if the Democrats comply, how will they justify their own philosophy that sets them apart from the despicable right wing hate mongering of Bush-Cheney-Rove? Americans haven’t turned socially liberal overnight. Democrats will have to give them a good reason to vote for them in two years when there won’t be the shadow of Bush-Cheney to swing the election their way. Can they do it without selling out and pandering to values that will alienate liberal Democrats like me?  I hope so. But it will be a fine balancing act and I am not entirely sure that they are capable of it. Brian Leiter sums up nicely my own doubts, sobering thoughts and lack of unqualified euphoria.      

  • Tomorrow is a crucial election day. My advice: "Vote early, vote Democrat and vote often" – the last, only if you are voting Democratic ! All kidding aside, please do remember to cast your ballot (if you  haven’t done so already) for what you believe and against what you reject.  Remember Bush-Cheney-Rove, Katrina, Jack Abramoff and the disaster in Iraq.

    I am keenly looking forward to tomorrow’s election.  As has been my practice for many years, this year too I campaigned quite diligently for Congressman Nick Lampson (for Tom DeLay’s seat) and Neeta Sane, a neighbor of mine, who is contesting the county treasurer’s seat in our district on a Democratic ticket.  I did block walking, phone banking, stuffing envelopes with campaign fliers etc. for both of them. On Sunday I got a call to work at a polling station as an election worker. I  accepted.  I have never done this before. I expect it to be a simple job but I am wondering if there will be any Republican hanky panky in the form of voter intimidation, illegal campaigning etc.  My district is very, very conservative. I won’t be surprised if I see some right wing misbehavior.  If I do, I will report to you faithfully all the gory details.

    Let us see what happens in my district, in Texas and nationwide. There are several races which everyone will be watching. There may be both pleasant and nasty surprises in store, depending on whose side one is on. Once the vote tallies are in, I will know whether to laugh or grumble.  Either way, you will probably hear from me on Wednesday.

    Update: Here is an example of dirty tricks – not in my district, but elsewhere.