Accidental Blogger

A general interest blog

  • Could dwarfs hold the key to cancer therapy?  Sounds promising.

  • What the fluff is happening? (link)

    The Iraq war has ended, troops are coming home and Thomas Friedman has decided to stop scattering his pearls of wisdom.

    If you are scratching your head, see here. (link: Dean)

  • After the tight ship he ran during his lengthy campaign, Barack Obama finds himself in the midst of high drama and of course, it stars the Clintons. I am not sure that Hillary Clinton is the best choice for the secretary of State or any other cabinet position in the Obama administration for the same reasons why I opposed her as a presidential and vice-presidential candidate. I won’t go over the long list again but  will mention just three: Bill, Bill and Bill. If she eventually gets the position, no one exactly knows how it will play out and whether Obama, who was clearly rattled by Clinton & Clinton during the primary campaign, will be able to handle matters with his customary cool. Media commentators are all over the place on this one. Obama’s gamble with the Clintons is being characterized variously as shrewd, magnanimous, conciliatory, Linconesque and highly risky. Even those who support Hillary’s appointment to the high profile position, have their reservations ( here and here).  Others are unequivocally opposed to the idea (here and here). Excerpt from Ben Smith’s (a grudging supporter) article in the Politico.

    What is Barack Obama thinking?

    We’ve heard all the rational arguments: Hillary Rodham Clinton has more star power than Richard Holbrooke, more discipline than Bill Richardson, fewer bad jokes than John F. Kerry. She’s tough and competent. She’s a woman and a Democrat, making space for a Republican guy at Defense. It would get her out of the Senate. Both Obama and Clinton loved Doris Kearns Goodwin’s book, “Team of Rivals.”

    But the sum of those parts seems something less than the whole explanation for Obama’s first great presidential gamble: his move toward giving his former adversary, whose judgment on foreign policy he criticized relentlessly, by offering her the most important Cabinet position in his administration.

    Neither Holbrooke, Kerry nor Richardson would bring Clinton’s downsides: Her towering, volcanic husband; her own ambitions; and the endless speculation about the two of them.

    “She brings so much to the table,” said Abner Mikva, a former Clinton White House counsel and an Obama mentor. “On the other hand, there are the obvious downsides, the conflicts that that her husband has.”

    Also worth noting is the fact that all the other appointees picked by Obama have come on board quickly without any public fuss. Hillary Clinton’s name was one of the earliest to be floated. Since then we have learnt of a not so secret meeting in Chicago, witnessed an enigmatic statement by Clinton to the press, heard of negotiations (!) by intermediaries, read numerous speculations about what Bill might have to give up in order to pave the way for his wife but we still don’t know if Hillary will "accept" Obama’s offer. Also, what we haven’t seen, heard, read or witnessed so far during this suspense, is a single word from Barack Obama. As I said, it is exactly the kind of excruciating drama Obama doesn’t need at this time.

    No_drama_obama

    (Cartoon by Nick Anderson)

  • A church in Kansas Muslim_president is warning Americans to expect divine retribution for electing Barack Obama president.

  • War? Or Car? is really a pretty great blog. Check it out!

  • Arkansas’s Proposed Initiative Act No. 1 makes California’s Prop 8 look like puppies, chocolate, and rainbows. Or something.

    That state’s Proposed Initiative Act No. 1, approved by nearly 57
    percent of voters last week, bans people who are “cohabitating outside
    a valid marriage” from serving as foster parents or adopting children.
    While the measure bans both gay and straight members of cohabitating
    couples as foster or adoptive parents, the Arkansas Family Council
    wrote it expressly to thwart “the gay agenda.” Right now, there are
    3,700 other children across Arkansas in state custody; 1,000 of them
    are available for adoption. The overwhelming majority of these children
    have been abused, neglected or abandoned by their heterosexual parents.

    That’s obviously absurd as a policy matter. More absurd, if you believe in a concept of relative absurdity, I’d probably argue. But here’s my immediate reaction, which is also a question for any of our attorney/etc. readers who know this stuff better than me: isn’t that plainly unconstitutional as a matter of federal substantive due process?

  • Does the following story strike anyone else as a case of hilariously unintended irony? Or am I forcing an "unnatural" analogy in my wicked mind?

    Garden_gnome_2 The gnomes, along with plastic flowers and other decorations such as teddy bears, have been called "inappropriate" and tacky by the Diocese of Bath and Wells.

    The church banned the garden figures from Wrington and Congresbury cemeteries in Somerset, and have said they will remove any that they find as part of new guidelines issued by the Chancellor of the Diocese, Worshipful Timothy Briden.

    A spokesman for the Diocese of Bath and Wells said: "There is no such thing as a real gnome so why should we have such unnatural creatures in churchyards?" (emphasis mine)

  • An unusual story of a man his animal companion.  (via Leiter Reports)

    Philosopherwolf2It’s strange. I can remember all these things about Brenin and Yukon and Sitka. I can remember holding Brenin up to my face and looking in his yellow wolf eyes. I can remember the way he felt, with his soft cub fur, between my hands as I held him. I can still picture clearly Yukon standing up on his hind legs, staring down at me, big feet hanging over the stable door. I can still picture Brenin’s brothers and sisters running around the pen, tumbling over each other and jumping back to their feet in glee. But of the person who sold me Brenin, I can remember virtually nothing. Something had already started; a process that would become more and more pronounced as the years rolled on. I was already starting to tune out human beings. When you have a wolf, they take over your life in a way that a dog seldom does. And human company gradually becomes less and less significant for you. I remember his story – at least I think I do – but I don’t remember the man.

  • On my last trip to India, I did not have an opportunity to go to an art gallery or museum but I did have two enjoyable art related encounters. One was the search I undertook for a recently published but hard- to- find book about my first art teacher, the late Abani Sen, which put me in touch with his son whom I had last seen as a school girl. The other was meeting artist Mimi Radhakrishnan who later pleasantly surprised me with a gift of the book I was looking for. 

    Mimi is an artist and a published author of fiction. In fact, I had read her book of short stories several years before I met her in person. During a meeting in her home, I had the pleasure of touring Mimi’s studio. I saw several finished paintings as well as some works in progress in preparation for an upcoming exhibition in 2009. (An added treat was viewing a few samples of her husband, renowned sculptor Radhakrishnan’s superb creations)

    Trained in Kalabhavan, the art school at the university founded by Rabindranath Tagore at  Shantiniketan, Mimi began her artistic career as a print maker. Her "crossover" to the realm of painting is thoroughly joyful and well received as attested to by the following profile.

    MimiWe normally use two categories of artists- one trained in an art school as opposed to the naïve autodidact. But Mimi insists that even an artist, highly skilled in a specific medium, may step into the territory of the latter exemplified by her own transition from printmaking to painting. At the time of deep crisis while wrestling with the intractability of oil painting, she would draw strength from her memory, of what Ramkinker Baij used to tell his students about how he learnt about the technique of painting: it was from a salesman at the G C Laha paint shop in Calcutta that Kinker discovered the joy of oil painting and paints’ changing texture and viscosity when mixed with linseed oil and turpentine!

    So how would a printmaker handle paint? It is in this crucial question that I locate a contemporary concern in the disjuncture between her technique and her content. The technique of oil painting taken up by her allows direct contact with the surface of the canvas but the form that builds up under the execution of her brush draws from a repertoire of the always and already seen, known and experienced. In the Swirl Called China is a mis-en-scene of images considered Chinese in tourism brochures. No wonder that in the titles of her works, there is a recurring reference to “memory”. At the level of content, she registers the mediatedness, a necessary technical imperative in printmaking but now applied to a mode of representation. This makes her combine the expressionist potential of oil painting, essentially stroke based with a printmaker’s obsession with the procedural, working from one palimpsest to another. Again, her writer’s acumen of writing page after page translated well into painting layer after layer, as if a long narrative and strings of characters have been telescoped into a painterly spectacle.

    Indeed. In executing her paintings, Mimi wears the additional hats of a print maker and story teller. Many of her paintings are framed by a "border" – like a sari or an embroidered shawl. The backgrounds  are textured with print like motifs – fish scales, floral, water lines. The story-like character of the compositions derives from the repetition of a theme over several canvases and titles like "Holding Dodo’s Eggs in Despair" and "Masked Men in Conversation."  Characters appear and reappear through series of paintings. Friends meet at the foot of a mountain in one panel. They begin a journey in the next and reach a magical destination in the third. In one painting the bearded sage Chamatkari Baba lands among expectant devotees. Then they gather to celebrate with abandon. In the final canvas one of them receives the Baba’s final blessings. There is a dream like quality to the paintings like the tales of a fabulist. In all of them, Mimi pointed out to me what the figures may be "thinking" and where they are "going."  Notice the three portraits I have posted below the fold. They belong to a series representing Muslim women of India with names like Dr. Jahanara Begum, Professor Nusrat Rizvi and Miss Niloufer, B.Sc. III Yr. The portraits are of imaginary women. Mimi gives them names and educational credentials that evoke real personalities and vocations. The two Istanbul pieces illustrate the artist’s knack for mural like compositions, juxtaposing related human figures, artifacts and edifices as parts of a larger commentary.

    Mimi’s artistic eye and training spill over into her surroundings – in her tastefully designed home and the lush garden she has planted in her backyard, an unexpected and pleasing oasis amidst the overdeveloped urban south Delhi neighborhood. She is also an ardent and unapologetic cat lover. Three cats share her home and garden with Mimi. Her husband claims that during the course of the day she has more conversations with her tabby Baichung than she does with him. The title of her last exhibition (all the paintings posted here are from that show) was Twisted Tales – Between Images and Words. My second meeting with Mimi lasted a little over two hours. During that time she and I discussed our cats for nearly forty five minutes. That might strike some who don’t understand cats, as a twisted tale of sorts!      

    Please turn the page for the thumbnail images of some of Mimi’s paintings – be sure to click for enlargement.
     

    (more…)

  • Orwell No one speaks the language of politics as thoughtfully, accurately and dispassionately as Orwell did. The contrast with the heedless conversation witnessed in our recent political campaign about patriotism, honor, "real" America, socialists, terrorists, pigs, pitbulls and barracudas is painfully stark.

    Here is an interesting blog – Orwell’s journal entries published daily on the same date as Orwell wrote them seventy years ago. (the dates appear in the non-American style – day / month /year) Most are pastorial musings about the weather, gardening and farm animals alongside some simple sketches. No political language here but fun to read nonetheless.

  • Conservative blogger John Hinderaker has advice for Barack Obama:  "Take public speaking lessons from George W. Bush!" (link: TPM)

    Obama thinks he is a good talker, but he is often undisciplined when he speaks. He needs to understand that as President, his words will be scrutinized and will have impact whether he intends it or not. In this regard, President Bush is an excellent model; Obama should take a lesson from his example. Bush never gets sloppy when he is speaking publicly. He chooses his words with care and precision, which is why his style sometimes seems halting. In the eight years he has been President, it is remarkable how few gaffes or verbal blunders he has committed. [italics mine] If Obama doesn’t raise his standards, he will exceed Bush’s total before he is inaugurated.

    Really?