Accidental Blogger

A general interest blog

  • Cross-posted from Fluff-n-Stuff

    ——————————————————————————————————————

    Rubberduck
    So Hillary Clinton announced in a meeting that as a little girl she had learned to shoot and gone hunting ducks with her dad.

    "As
    I told you, my dad taught me how to shoot behind our cottage,” she
    said. “I have gone hunting. I am not a hunter. But I have gone hunting."

    Clinton said she has hunted ducks.

    Take that all you namby-pamby  elitist urban liberals who have zero experience with gun powder. Bang, bang, bang! You’re dead.

    (more…)

  • Big news: Fafblog! is back to save the universe. 

    Of course by now everybody thinks they’re an expert on every little accident that’s happened in the moon war. Oh, we didn’t send enough troops, oh, we didn’t plan for the aftermath, oh, the explosions launched millions of tons of radioactive moon rock into the atmosphere and killed hundreds of thousands of people. Well, boo hoo hoo! Nobody said this war was gonna be perfect.1 It’s true, if Giblets had to blow up the moon all over again he would have made some changes, like firing Donald Rumsfeld and putting more boots on the ground and getting more international support.2 But would he oppose the moon war altogether? Well that’s the kinda crazy talk we were only hearing from namby-pamby pot-smoking puppet-wielding moon hippies like Al Gore and Zbigniew Brzezinski and their Stalinist fellow travelers at International ANSWER!3 And what was their solution to the rapidly growing moon crisis? Nothing but peace songs and patchouli smell and nothing!

    The point is, we saw a problem and we dealt with it. Did the problem actually exist? Who knows! Did our solution end up killing lots of people who’d otherwise be alive? Who can say! We could spend all day long pointing fingers and arguing over who slaughtered millions of what, but where will that get us?4 And while all the negative nancies are squabbling over who genocided who, Giblets and the rest of America have a war to win. There’s still a lot of the moon left to blow up, people – and now it’s even more dangerous than ever, because it’s been raining this deadly shower of moon rocks down on us ever since some crazy bastards started blowing it up! It’s time to stop this pointless bickering over who was "right" and "wrong" and get back to fighting the war we started back when we were obviously wrong. And then we can move on to the real threat by invading the sun.

    1. With the possible exception of Giblets, in his February 23, 2003 Washington Post op-ed, "This War Is Going To Be Perfect."
    2. Because when you blow stuff up and kill people it’s important that you blow stuff up and kill people in a way that maintains international respect and legitimacy for future blow-stuff-uppery and people-killing.
    3. Giblets is on to you, ANSWER! Oh sure, you say you’re just opposed to pointless and criminal wars, but Giblets knows it’s all part of your sinister socialist scheme to free Mumia!
    4. Other than a war crimes tribunal. Which would only weaken us in the war by emboldening future war crimes tribunals!

    Blog readers, you can relax now.  All is as it should be.

  • Based on computer modeling studies, University of Colorado scientists predict that a limited nuclear war between India and Pakistan will not only cause havoc in the vicinity of the Indian subcontinent; it will also have far reaching effects on human (and animal) health and the environment worldwide.

    Nuclear_radiation_2A limited nuclear weapons exchange between Pakistan and India using their current arsenals could create a near-global ozone hole, triggering human health problems and wreaking environmental havoc for at least a decade, according to a study led by the University of Colorado at Boulder.

    The computer-modeling study showed a nuclear war between the two countries involving 50 Hiroshima-sized nuclear devices on each side would cause massive urban fires and loft as much as 5 million metric tons of soot about 50 miles into the stratosphere, said CU-Boulder Research Associate Michael Mills, chief study author. The soot would absorb enough solar radiation to heat surrounding gases, setting in motion a series of chemical reactions that would break down the stratospheric ozone layer protecting Earth from harmful ultraviolet radiation, said Mills.

    "We would see a dramatic drop in ozone levels that would persist for many years," said Mills of CU-Boulder’s Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics. "At mid- latitudes the ozone decrease would be up to 40 percent, which could have huge effects on human health and on terrestrial, aquatic and marine ecosystems."

    A paper on the subject, titled "Massive Global Ozone Loss Predicted Following A Regional Nuclear Conflict," appeared the week of April 7 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Co-authors on the study include CU-Boulder Professor Brian Toon, UCLA Professor Richard Turco and National Center for Atmospheric Research scientists Douglas Kinnison and Rolando Garcia.

    More here.

  • (Thanks to Ruchira for the idea and links)

    ‘Give us this day our daily meds’ has become the new grace all over the U.S. thanks to the agressive approach to sales and marketing of designer drugs by Big Pharma. While a huge amount of money has gone into finding cures for obscure conditions, the pharmaceutical industry’s investment is recouped a thousand-fold or more by simply persuading more people that they might suffer from the condition and therefore need drug XYZ to pre-emptively treat it.

    Gone are the days of the snake-oil salesman climbing up on a crate to advertise his wares to small groups or quaint ads in papers with circulation and reach of a few thousand citizens.
    Mothofdeath We now have celebrities asking us smilingly on TV whether we should be considering, now that we have turned 40/50/60, whether we can prevent osteoporosis by ingesting this or that pill. Or  the ‘radioactive moths of death’ flitting around to bestow the kiss of death-like sleep on people who ‘just can’t seem to sleep without waking through the night’.Or jolly little pastel balloons filled with water bouncing around London and Paris, with a burst balloon symbolizing ‘overactive bladder syndrome’. Or couples in tasteful embraces being interrupted during tender moments which are nevertheless easily postponed, due to the qualities of whatever ‘erectile dysfunction’ drug the ad is hawking.  Some of these ads come with a voice over rapping out the disclaimer in a monotone sure to lull the viewer into sleep (probably better than the sleep pill being hawked.)

    (Moth of death photo from maxintosh’s flickr photostream)

    (more…)

  • With the Summer Olympics just a few months away, China is running into problems, already visible in the inaugural ceremony of the Olympic torch relay. The relay, dubbed the "The Journey of Harmony" by the Chinese government has been anything but harmonious.  Several attempts have been made to extinguish the torch which is scheduled to pass through several different countries after its initial lighting in Athens, Greece and before it reaches the host nation. The first protest took place in Athens itself during the lighting ceremony when demonstrators loudly decried China’s crackdown in Tibet. Later on its way through London, the torch was accosted by human rights activists who attempted to douse its flame. The government of China denounced the act as "vile behavior."  On Monday in Paris, the torch relay was disrupted several times when demonstrators managed to extinguish the flame on five different occasions despite heavy security, some of it provided by China. The Paris torch run was eventually cut short. So far the Olympic torch has met with protesters in three of the four cities it has passed through.  More protests are expected when the torch reaches San Francisco on Wednesday where plans are under way to stage similar interruptions and road blocks. The International Olympics Committee is now rethinking its plan to continue with the scheduled torch relay.

    Olympic_handcuffsAbout 3,000 French police officers, some of them spraying Mace, sought to guard the 17-mile parade route but were often unable to stop demonstrators, many of them waving Tibetan flags, from surging onto the streets as torch carriers passed. At least three times, the torch was extinguished and the athletes retreated for protection into buses.

    Protesters often used the most picturesque landmarks in Paris — the Eiffel Tower, the Arc de Triomphe and Champs-Elysees, the Louvre Museum and Notre Dame Cathedral — as backdrops for screaming face-offs with police and large groups of flag-waving pro-China supporters.

    The torch ceremony is a rich Olympic tradition, and the growing movement against it has left some Olympic officials considering whether to cut back the 58-day pageant, during which the Olympic flame is to travel 85,000 miles through 21 countries.

    "The International Olympic Committee may have a bigger problem when the torch relay continues, if we get more of these demonstrations," Tove Paule, the head of Norway’s Olympic Committee, told public broadcaster NRK after a meeting with Olympic officials in Beijing. "One will have to look at whether the plans need to be changed."

    In recent weeks, pressure has been mounting on the International Olympic Committee to respond to complaints from activists and politicians that China’s lack of political freedom is incompatible with the values enshrined in the Olympic Charter. Officials have said that they are concerned about Tibet but that the IOC is not a political organization and cannot strong-arm the host government.

    While the protests have targeted China’s overall dismal record of human rights, most demonstrations have focused on Tibet whose plight touches a special sympathetic chord among peace activists worldwide. The truth however is that China is an equal opportunity oppressor.  Chinese citizens – laborers, rural populations and even poorer residents of Beijing have faced brutal treatment at the hands of their government. Evictions, displacements and abuse of labor laws to facilitate shiny new developments for the Olympics  have been commonplace in much of China for quite some time now.

    A boycott of the athletic competition portion of the Olympics has garnered scant support. Organizers, athletes and the viewing public feel that the games should be above politics. Fair enough. But the Olympics as a public relations endeavor IS about politics especially for regimes like China, which wants to exploit the occasion to strut, primp and display its growing economic might. So world dignitaries for whom China is gussying up, should seriously consider giving the opening and closing ceremonies a miss. Let only athletes attend and compete. Speaker Nancy Pelosi (whom the Chinese government calls a "meddler") and Senator Hillary Clinton have called upon President Bush to stay away from the Olympic ceremonies. Barack Obama has condemned China’s actions in Tibet and human rights violations but he is equivocal about a boycott. (I am with Hillary on this one) The White House has indicated that George W. Bush will attend the opening ceremonies. What is Bush worried about? What does he think China might do if snubbed? Start bullying Taiwan or cozy up to Sudanese warlords?  Add melamine to pet food or lead in children’s toys?  Contaminate human food and adulterate pharmaceutical products?  Come on now – surely, China will do no such thing!

    (I had weighed in on the Chinese Olympics once before.  I notice that Joe too has had his say.)

  • Wood_2
    The illustrious ex-New Republic man of letters, and current Harvard Professor for the Practice of Literary Criticism, James Wood has weighed in in the New Yorker on Richard Price’s _Lush Life.  The short of it is that he quite liked the book — but he also made a great show of saying that reviewers who compare Price to a reporter don’t understand that actually he makes up the dialogue!  Since my review of Price makes just such a reporter comparison, in the very first sentence no less, our own Dean Rowan wondered if perhaps Wood was responding to me.  Now I don’t flatter myself that the  distinguished Professor for the Practice of Literary Criticism (the PPLC — sounds a bit like a group of shadowy Latin American freedom fighters) would be talking to me in particular. 

    But I will respond to Wood’s point: yes, Price’s dialogue is highly stylized, and that’s what makes it a hoot to read.  In real life, no one is as witty, poised, or culturally literate as Price’s characters.  That said, Price clearly works very hard to try to be current with the slang and habits of the various demographic groups in his books.  And like the naturalist writers Crane and Dreiser with whom I tried to draw a parallel, Price  zeroes in on particular details of his characters, even as his book suggests that each person is merely a type of character within impersonal sociological groups.  The details of personality matter much less in the novel than the character’s particular role within the machinery of society.  The characters don’t really get anything from speaking so much and so well — they, and Price, just do it for the joy of saying outrageous, clever things.

  • On the front page of ESPN, there is a link to a story about Hillary calling for George Bush to boycott the opening ceremony for the Beijing Olympics.  On the front page of CNN, there is a link to a story about Hillary bowling a gutter-ball on a daytime talk show.

    Does anyone else find this incredibly disturbing?  ESPN’s story relates to legitimate news in both sport and politics.  CNN’s story is completely worthless.

    (Incidentally, this is the rare opportunity where I have an opportunity to praise Senator Clinton, so here goes: Good call, Senator, on calling for the President to boycott the opening ceremony on account of China’s activities in Sudan, not to mention its activities in, well, China.)

    (Of course, this is anything but a rare opportunity for me to continue my crusade against the media, which I continue to find pathetic and a failure in its role as the fourth estate.)

  • Ue
    Reading Jhumpa Lahiri’s latest collection of short stories "Unaccustomed Earth" left me with the feeling of watching life unfold in slow motion. I felt as though as I was walking through treacle, time slowing down to a crawl as I took a break from reading to venture out on a short shopping expedition. Luckily, the effect faded after 5 minutes.

    The book has been reviewed to death already: no less than twice on the NY Times – effusion I, effusion II. (login subscription needed) Though not all critics have been kind to her- this one likens reviewing her books to throwing pebbles at an elephant. Another faults her for too narrow a canvas. Not that I completely agree with the paeans or the criticisms.

     

    (more…)

  • Normally New York Times op-eds annoy me (David Brooks, anyone?  Not to mention Dowd on a day when her snark fails to be funny…).  A notable exception is Paul Krugman’s column today on how, in the context of health care reform, John McCain is a dirty liar, and also possibly evil.  (Okay, the words "dirty liar" and "possibly evil" might be my own, so don’t be disappointed if you read his column and don’t actually see McCain referred to in those terms.  He does, however, refer to the McCain health plan as merely "a set of bullet points on the campaign’s Web site.")

    Elizabeth Edwards has cancer. John McCain has had cancer in the
    past. Last weekend, Mrs. Edwards bluntly pointed out that neither of
    them would be able to get insurance under Mr. McCain’s health care plan.

    It’s about time someone said
    that and, more generally, made the case that Mr. McCain’s approach to
    health care is based on voodoo economics — not the supply-side voodoo
    that claims that cutting taxes increases revenues (though Mr. McCain
    says that, too), but the equally foolish claim, refuted by all
    available evidence, that the magic of the marketplace can produce cheap
    health care for everyone.

    As Mrs. Edwards pointed out, the McCain
    health plan would do nothing to prevent insurance companies from
    denying coverage to those, like her and Mr. McCain, who have
    pre-existing medical conditions.

    The McCain campaign’s response
    was condescending and dismissive — a statement that Mrs. Edwards
    doesn’t understand the comprehensive nature of the senator’s approach,
    which would harness “the power of competition to produce greater
    coverage for Americans,” reducing costs so that even people with
    pre-existing conditions could afford care.

    This is nonsense on multiple levels.

    What this should tell us, I think, is that however we might feel about Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, it is very important for a lot of people in this country that the eventual Democratic nominee win the election, and that "possibly evil" war hero not be elected President.

  • Long time readers will surely remember Matt who used to regularly entertain us with his comments and rhymes on A.B. We also had a link to his very funny (now discontinued) political blog Cerulean Blue. Well, Matt has not visited us for a long time. During his absence, he and I have touched base a few times via email.

    Quite some time ago Matt had shared with me the information that he has Asperger’s Syndrome – a very mild and highly functional form of autism.  Yesterday I learnt that Matt now writes a new blog, very different from his previous one.  He explained to me why he chose to do so:

    ..I’m frustrated by the fact that there are very few stories about adults with mild autism…it’s almost all kid-related stories…which is understandable, but it’s an imbalance in need of a remedy. So, I’m just wanting to focus on Asperger’s, describe what it can look like in adulthood, at least from one perspective.

    I am very pleased that Matt has given me permission to share his blog information with our readers (The Incipient Turvy is now on our blog roll). Yesterday I posted a couple of stories on adults who have made the adjustment of understanding their severely autistic children. Matt’s point of view will shed light on the other end of the spectrum – functional adults who are learning to understand and live with mild forms of the condition. I am happy to welcome Matt back to A.B. We hope to see him here more often.

  • Today is World Autism Awareness Day. Many debates are afoot among doctors, researchers and parents regarding the genetic and environmental causes of autism, as also why there appears to be a rise in its occurance. But what is agreed upon universally by all sides is the fact that parents of children with autism face a challenge that is daunting.  Following are the stories of two mothers from two different parts of the world and their determination to relate with their autistic sons and make them functional in a world where there is little awareness of the difficult condition that afflicts them.

    From India, Tito and his mother:

    Tito_and_somaIn his mind, bells are ringing, unintegrated sensory stimuli clanging. Somewhere in the house, a chair is grievously out of position, a pillow askew. He has to ignore everything. He wants what all of us want: to be understood.  So Tito Rajarshi Mukhopadhyay sits at the dining room table in his home on Shoal Creek Boulevard and writes in a notebook, his mother, Soma, to his right, reading the words one by one as they go from brain to paper.

    "I may act different," Soma says, speaking the words her 19-year-old severely autistic son all but cannot. "It is because of my Titoistic traits."

    The assumption, once commonly held, was that people at the extreme end of the autism spectrum needed to be locked away, unreachable, unable to perceive, much less communicate meaningfully, express complex or abstract thought or empathize. Tito does. In a notebook, on a word processor or a computer, he writes. He writes his memories and musings, mostly about what it’s like to be autistic, and often with a certain playfulness and wit. He writes poetry. He e-mails. He blogs.

    "He opens a window into the autistic soul in a way that had not been done before," says Jeannette Seaver, the publisher of Arcade Publishing, which this month is releasing "How Can I Talk if My Lips Don’t Move? Inside My Autistic Mind." (Tito and his mother Soma now live in Austin, Texas)

    From China, Yang Tao and his mom:

    Stars_and_rain_school_for_autism When — after many visits to doctors and hospitals — Tian Huiping’s son was finally diagnosed with autism, the only advice she was given was to make use of a loophole in China’s "one-child" policy that allows parents with disabled children to have one more. Alone with her son after her husband divorced her, Tian became depressed and desperate enough to consider killing herself and her son, Yang Tao.

    "I made a poison for me and my son," she said.

    But when she saw her boy smiling up at her happily, she says she couldn’t do it.

    (more…)

  • The most troublesome point in a politician’s career is where the opposition’s criticism coincides with the suspicions of one’s own party loyalists.  That the narrative about Hillary and Bill Clinton emanating from both the left and the right are merging, should say something about the couple whether or not their supporters recognize it. More often than not, the area of agreement on both sides seems to be the astonishment at the Clintons’ overarching quest for power and the depths of deception they are willing to stoop to in order to realize that ambition.  "I did not have sex with that woman," uttered with finger wagging emphasis; "I remember landing under sniper-fire. There was supposed to be some kind of greeting ceremony at the airport but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base," described in a tone of self deprecatory valor. The declarations remain, suspended in the public perception until a 12 year old video or a stained blue dress makes its appearance.  Such casual disregard for truth point to a mindset that views politics as war whose spoils are personal power. Lying routinely as a way of self aggrandizement and demonizing one’s detractors come naturally to Mr. and Mrs. Clinton.

    It began almost a year ago. To my astonishment, I grudgingly started to find common ground with Republicans in my assessment of the "Clinton character." It was as if some unpleasant repressed memories surfaced with the prospect of the Clintons getting back in the White House. When the Democratic presidential race took off in earnest, I expressed my unease with a possible Clinton presidency early on in this blog.  As time has gone by, almost all left leaning bloggers and columnists as well as several of Hillary Clinton’s senate and elected party colleagues have deserted her side due to similar discontent over the unsavory nature of the Clintonian myths and drama that seem to unfold daily on the national stage. So, it did not surprise me when I read a column by Peggy Noonan, the grande dame of the intellectual wing of the GOP and found myself nodding in agreement.  Noonan herself doesn’t say anything that we don’t already know. But she quotes from an pseudonymous poster named GI Joe whose satirical riff on Hillary Clinton dodging bullets in Bosnia, though exaggerated, perfectly captures the tenor of a Clinton lie.

    "Actually Mrs. Clinton was too modest. I was there and saw it all. When Mrs. Clinton got off the plane the tarmac came under mortar and machine gun fire. I was blown off my tank and exposed to enemy fire. Mrs. Clinton without regard to her own safety dragged me to safety, jumped on the tank and opened fire, killing 50 of the enemy. Soon a suicide bomber appeared, but Mrs. Clinton stopped the guards from opening fire. She talked to the man in his own language and got him [to] surrender. She found that he had suffered terribly as a result of policies of George Bush. She defused the bomb vest herself. Then she turned to his wounds. She stopped my bleeding and saved my life. Chelsea donated the blood."

    Hillary Clinton has taken Barack Obama to task for staying with Reverend Wright, the church pastor with a penchant for inflammatory rhetoric.  She huffily proclaimed that one cannot choose one’s relatives (Obama’s grandma, for example) but one certainly can choose a pastor.  News to Mrs. Clinton – one CAN choose one’s relatives … when the relative is a spouse who humiliates you time and again. But that she doesn’t think so, is her business.  However, shouldn’t she be a bit careful before carelessly casting stones at others?  As for keeping questionable company, see who was sitting beside Hillary Clinton when she sanctimoniously scolded her opponent.

    More on Hillary’s war stories, this time from the left – Frank Rich in NYT.