Accidental Blogger

A general interest blog

From the New York Times a few weeks ago:

"Spending an idle morning watching people look at art is hardly a scientific experiment, but it rekindles a perennial question: What exactly are we looking for when we roam as tourists around museums? As with so many things right in front of us, the answer may be no less useful for being familiar."

Why indeed do we wander around museums? Is it the age-old quest for finding ourselves in our past, the thirst for knowledge? Or the window-shopper and street-gawker's instinct? Is it less about stopping and staring and more about bragging rights as in "I visited the Louvre, when we were last in Paris." Or maybe a combination of 'All of the Above"?
As a kid in Paris, I had been on school field trips to various sections of the Louvre, spending a few hours once in the Egyptian section, and another visit in the Greek section, but remember very little of what are considered to be its main attractions. My recent visit was an all new-experience,  reminding me that it was perhaps at the Louvre that I acquired my taste for museum-hopping no matter where in the world we went.

—————————————————–

Ah, the Louvre! The perfect place to loiter leisurely, gazing at John the Baptist's all-knowing smile, or perchance the mysterious magnificence of the Mona Lisa.That is, until the hordes of tourists and tour guides waving flags, assorted brochures and even umbrellas to keep their groups together, all trample over you in their eagerness to see the next item on the 'Da Vinci Code' tour.

The Monna Lisa was unreachable. A special line of the devoted faithful had to be stood in and endured, before you were able to partake of her timeless gaze at closer quarters. We settled for the distant view. Even hoisting my daughter onto her father's shoulders and placing a camera in her tiny fingers elicited an indignant "Not allowed" from a museum security official doing due diligence.

Never mind the barely visible main attraction- the huge painting of the Wedding Feast at Cana (Veronese) on the opposite side was quite a show-stopper, though precious few of the crowds milling around the Gioconda paid any attention to it.

With over 35,000 paintings and antiquities, we could have spent an entire month in the museum, but having only a day, we could only spend a paltry few minutes in each section, catching the 'highlighted items' suggested in the museum's brochure.
Then, we decided to linger in certain places, not quite the stuff of tourist lore, but quite fantastic nevertheless. The Persian section was eye-popping, with its huge capitals that took up so much room that one could barely imagine the size of the pillar that supported it.

A small crowd was milling around a rock edict which bore the Code of Hammurabi, with a prominently displayed French translation nearby- 'for X, off with the hand… for Y, off with the leg… for Z, off with the head…"- I provided a quick translation for my son: "…It's the Off-with-his-head school of justice",as an eavesdropping tourist nearby snickered in agreement.

The sculpture courtyard adjoining the Persian section was a relatively quiet place to recuperate from the milling crowds jostling to pose with the Winged Victory. I sat behind a statue of Hercules battling a gigantic snake , though not at a good vantage point (read, treated to a prominent view of the Derriere). I was reduced to sneaking peeks at the red charcoal drawing of the statue, which an art student was working on, right next to me. She had time to spare, tracing every contour with careful concentration, but tiring presently of her drawing, whipped out a cellphone and started a quiet conversation with a friend. So much for the slow version of museum enjoyment in the era of the cellphone.

My daughter wanted a drink of water, and the quest for a water fountain began in earnest. But the Louvre, being a palace more than a few centuries old, didn't have the requisite plumbing to handle the thirst of the trampling hordes, unlike the new-fangled shiny rest-roomed and water-fountained American museums. We waited in line desperately at the entrance to a crowded café in the museum, and 15 minutes after we made it in, a bored-looking waiter finally brought us a tiny cup of cappucino (10 Euros! Eeek!) and a bottle of Evian (3 Euros! Eeek-squared!). Next time we visited a Musée, we resolved to carry our own water, even if it was in a distinctly unfashionable recycled Fanta bottle.

The famed glass Pyramid was but a snatched glimpse through the windows of various wings, as we gaped our way through the luxurious apartments of Napoleon III. Then we redoubled our walk through the section of European painters, catching a few famous Rembrandt self-portraits in the process.

How did we manage to spend the better part of a day in a museum with my children who are notoriously allergic to museums? My teenager didn't complain much, having succumbed quite happily to the touristy notion of 'catching all the highlights' in the brochures. My 8-year old daughter was anointed the official photographer and religiously clicking away at everything in sight. Unfortunately, we only have a handful of usable pictures from her collection, but the camera was worth its price in gold, for the peace of mind and the Prime Whiner's busyness that it brought us.

——

Cross-posted from Fluff-n-Stuff

Posted in , , ,

3 responses to “Racing through the Louvre (Sujatha)”

  1. On my one and only visit to the Louvre, I too found it overwhelming in size and scope. Much prefer smaller museums. We did get close to the Mona Lisa though getting jostled by the excited throngs was very off-putting. One is surprised by how small the painting is.
    I hope you have a few more posts up your sleeve related to the trip. Our readers (and your co-bloggers) on A.B. do not know that you spent some time in your childhood in Paris and attended elementary school there. What I would like very much to hear is a personal account of how you felt about being back in the city as an adult and what childhood memories of your previous stay came into play.

    Like

  2. Dean C. Rowan

    All huge museums are aggregations of small museums. That’s my motto. Sujatha’s meanderings suggest a perfect way to view any museum, in bite-size pieces, one at a time as the spirit moves you. During a recent trip to DC, I ambled through the National Portrait Gallery and the adjacent Museum of American Art, admiring the busts of brooding doofuses who forged an empire or whatever, just a floor or two away from some compellingly funky contemporary stuff. It was a delightful couple of casual hours. At the Louvre, however, I’d avoid Leonardo–so overrated as an artist, such a tiresome icon of pointless innovation–and head for the Raphael.

    Like

  3. Dean:
    Bite-size pieces work well, but are best for the locals, not for the world-trotters who have a dozen other monuments to visit before they fly off into the sunset. I tend to do the sectional views most frequently at the Carnegie museums of Pittsburgh.
    Though I must warn you, in the Louvre, it is probably easier to get to the Leonardos than the Raphaels. Expect to be swept towards the Mona Lisa by the human tsunami, whether you wish it or not!
    Ruchira:
    The Mona Lisa is disappointingly small, but The Wedding Feast at Cana is the largest painting in the Louvre and surely one of the most vivid (some wag called positioning it opposite the ML a ‘triumph of curatorship’ in his blog. I’m sure that it was only half in jest.)
    Childhood memories are strangely focussed and specific things, as I realized when I visited an old apartment complex that we had lived in. There were some things that were crystal clear in my memories, and others which were completely wiped out.
    My husband was getting quite annoyed with me on the metro : “Surely you must remember this station…”
    “Nope, it’s a total blank”. As it turned out, we were travelling primarily on line 1, while the one I used as a kid was line 10.:)

    Like

Leave a reply to Dean C. Rowan Cancel reply