Accidental Blogger

A general interest blog

One of the top scientists handling India’s 1998 nuclear tests has acknowledged that the tests weren’t quite the unqualified successes they were officially hailed as. Specifically, it seems the thermonuclear (fusion) test was a dud. People outside India have said such things before, as have Indians off the public record, but it is potentially quite significant / uncomfortable that an important Indian scientist has publicly done the same:

His view was that India should not sign the CTBT and that it needed to conduct more thermonuclear tests.

“There is no country in the world,” he emphasised, “which managed to get its thermonuclear weapon right in just one test.” He said that he had also pointed to the fact that western seismic experts had doubted India’s claim that the three simultaneous tests on May 11 had a combined explosives yield of 60 kt.

The Santhanam revelation could have major reverberations in the country’s security policy. The Indo-US nuclear deal, for instance, rests upon the assumption that India will not test again.

It is also likely to make it difficult for the Manmohan Singh government to sign the CTBT, an issue that has gained considerable salience in the Obama administration’s non-proliferation policy.

[…]

Karnad, a professor at the Centre for Policy Research, felt that the Indian need to test again “is less a matter of opinion than of fact.”
In his view, Santhanam’s “extremely courageous stand” had struck a fatal blow at the foundation of the Indo-US nuclear deal “predicated on India’s never testing again and at any accommodationist policies the Manmohan Singh regime may be considering vis-a-vis the CTBT and the Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty”.

Posted in

7 responses to “Nuclear Fail and blow up (D)”

  1. My father, who had worked with ex-Pres.Kalam (a prince among politicians, and a politician among scientists), many years before he switched to DRDO, had this to say regarding Manoj Joshi’s article :
    “The article is fairly written and quite comprehensive about the details giving the near correct picture.” He had private confirmation about the problems with the test from informed sources, even as far back as 1998, as well.
    But consider then, many super-government agencies have this tendency to inflate or flatly misstate various achievements, just to guarantee that the head honchos get their dose of Padmashrees and Padmabhushans. The problems with Chandrayaan were known at the outset, it was not until very recently (after the top-level guys had made their awards and bonuses) that the premature ‘death’ of the mission was announced.

    Like

  2. aku

    Incidentally, the definitive article on how we were deceived on Chandryaan was also in Mail Today.

    Like

  3. Manoj told me about the follow up articles in The Hindu and Mail Today. But I am having a hard time locating the stories in either paper. Here is one that he posted on his blog. I assume it is the same one that appeared in Mail Today.

    Like

  4. D

    Ruchira, thanks for the new link. I’m surprised there are actual strategic (as opposed to political) goals that involve development of fusion bombs. In a world whose principal military fact seems to be that an Osama might get hold of a mere dirty bomb, it seems like even fission bombs ought to suffice for any deterrence capability (as for nuclear offense, MAD equalizes all such threats whether for democratic systems or for tinpot demagogic rulers) provided only that there are suitable delivery mechanisms. I’d have thought the strategic desiderata consisted entirely of airplanes, missiles and submarines capable of delivering the large bombs India already has.
    “a prince among politicians, and a politician among scientists”
    Sujatha, could you elaborate on this?

    Like

  5. D: It has to do with Kalam’s excellent knack of navigation the waters of intra-organizational politics in ISRO, before he moved on the DRDO. You can’t survive in such an organization without an excellent head for politics- hence the ‘politician among scientists’. The ‘prince among politicians’ nomenclature was more of the perception of him as a naive in the world of politics, from a science background and therefore not subject to the same oily standards that India normally expects in her politicians.

    Like

  6. Regarding the Chandrayan mission, the failure of a mission is no crime. such things ought to be expected.
    in hindsight, we know why the indian team was not dejected at this failure.

    Like

  7. D

    I didn’t think it was a big failure it all actually, not by space standards. Just last week they got some very nice publicity about finding high concentrations of water in moon dirt…

    Like

Leave a reply to aku Cancel reply