Accidental Blogger

A general interest blog

About a week ago, I read a blogblurb raving about some new phone app, which would use the power of GPS to tell you where you were and highlight the most interesting thing in the vicinity.For instance, if you were in France, walking near the Eiffel tower, your phone could superimpose cool factoids and trivia about the Eiffel tower on the screen, allowing you to become a walking encyclopedia, in more ways than one.

Heaven forbid that you should just put your phone away and just look up at the Huge Tower. There, just in front of you.

Kidinmuseum Today's review of museum apps (from the NY Times) suggests that  we have indeed reached the era of phone-toting zombies wandering around the halls of sarcophagi and Picass(i?), colliding as they swipe, swirl and shove their way across their touch screens. The guard rails around the exhibits had better be strengthened to prevent untoward accidents as the wired museum goer pays more attention to the screen than the exhibit.

From the article:

"You have to type in strings of as many as eight or nine digits to get information about an object, though many cannot be found in the system; some offer less information than the museum’s label. The app’s real point, though, is its embrace of populist Web culture,  in which votes and tags are supposed to yield a kind of collective wisdom. If you are looking at an object in the program, you can “vote” for it by clicking on a button with a heart, declaring your taste: “Like this.” You are then directed to other objects people have “liked” in the same gallery and can see how many votes they get. (Few people seem to use this system: the number of “likes” rarely seems to rise above five.)"

Talk about walking hazards, as you attempt to key in all of the above and 'Like' a particular exhibit, and follow the map presented to you to the next object you might 'Like'.

In fairness, though, the author of the article, after weary recaps of every museum app he tried, concludes:

"It is best to consider all these apps flawed works in progress. So much more should be possible. Imagine standing in front of an object with an app that, sensing your location, is already displaying precisely the right information. It might offer historical background or direct you through links to other works that have some connection to the object. It might provide links to critical commentary. It might become, for each object, an exhibition in itself, ripe with alternate narratives and elaborate associations.

And, best of all, you could save it for later, glance up from the screen and look carefully at what faces you, all scrims removed, all distractions discarded. Like this! There must be an app for that!"

Try looking at the objects in the museum, instead of the phone screen. What a revolutionary concept!

Posted in , , ,

5 responses to “Through a Glass, Digitally (Sujatha)”

  1. I hate to vilify my own husband before friends and strangers. But there was one bus ride we took in Fort Lauderdale when he plugged in the “to and from” address in his newly purchased Blackberry’s google map search and for nearly 40 minutes, looked at it instead of looking out of the window! Even more irritating was the fact that he also kept up a running commentary beside me (who could see things outside in real life) about which street / intersection/ landmark/ body of water was coming up!

    Like

  2. I’ve seen the same with my husband :(
    That’s not to say that obnoxious travellers in pre-cellphone eras couldn’t go around declaiming with gusto from a Fodor’s. At least not everyone did that, but with the current ubiquity of cellphones, everybody can be an annoying and oblivious tour guide to those less wired who just want to ‘see the sights’.

    Like

  3. Dean C. Rowan

    Maybe there’s a gender predisposition to allegory. I love gazing at a print map while taking a road trip, presumably not driving, too.
    The author’s naivete is charming. The apps are works in “progress,” he explains. That’s fairyland thinking. It should be clear to anybody with a modicum of experience with digital technologies that they tend to decline in quality and performance over time, a function of the market demand for innovation.

    Like

  4. I should hope you weren’t driving and reading the map, Dean. Sounds like a great way to crash into something.
    Actually, the apps are probably in their final form, not to be reviewed for bugs and such- they were probably created by a bunch of enthusiastic interns at the museums, and may have some slight value in allowing the museums to claim that they aren’t your grandfather’s ‘just walk and look around’ but have all the latest jazz in connectivity.

    Like

  5. Andrew R.

    I think we should start calling them “dumb-phones.”

    Like

Leave a reply to Dean C. Rowan Cancel reply