Accidental Blogger

A general interest blog

  • I received the following e-mail from fellow blogger Namit Arora who is traveling to China later this month and has just discovered that his blog (where I am a co-author) is not accessible from China. He checked and found that Accidental Blogger too is blocked. Namit wrote:

    I found out that my website and SN (Shunya’s Notes) are not accessible from China. The Great Firewall (as it is called) blocks it. Perhaps because I have material on Tibetans which may be seen as sympathetic to their cause. China censors a large number of sites. Searches in china for Falun gong and Tiananmen square democracy uprising produce very different results. 

    http://blogoscoped.com/censored/

    AB (Accidental Blogger) is also blocked in China (except from Hong Kong; test for yourself). Congratulations on being a thorn to the Chinese commies!
    http://www.websitepulse.com/help/testtools.china-test.html

    I checked for Beijing and Shanghai and indeed we are blocked. Now, that is funny. I know that we used to get a noticeable amount of traffic from China (from both Beijing and Shanghai among others) earlier and still do from Hong Kong where access is available. The Globe Tracker widget on the sidebar shows me that even now China ranks as 30th among all the countries whose incoming traffic to A.B. has been tracked since I installed the tracker. That means access has been curtailed quite recently.

    We don’t write much on Chinese affairs here. Why would a small and inconsequential blog like ours raise a red flag in China?  Could it be because of this and this?  Most likely. And we haven’t even written about this!

  • (Indians and Pakistanis light candles at a border town, jointly commemorating the independence days of both countries. Photo: Times of India)Indiapakistan

    India and Pakistan celebrate the sixtieth anniversary of their independence this month – India on the 15th of August and Pakistan, a day earlier on the 14th.

    Sixty years ago, the ancient land of India was partitioned to form two brand new countries – India and Pakistan, under circumstances that can only be described as a nightmare. Since then the two nations have gone their different ways, choosing their philosophies, allies and enemies to best suit their own interests. But all through their separate existence, neither can forget about the other’s looming presence across the border. (Pakistan was further broken up in 1971 into Pakistan and Bangladesh.) The neighborly relations between India and Pakistan can be best described to include an uneasy truce, continued low level hostility and in the past six decades, four full fledged wars.

    There are several sides to the story of India’s partition and fingers can be pointed at those who were responsible – and there were many. But there is no doubt that what lay at the heart of this unfortunate event was suspicion, greed, intolerance, unseemly hurry at political power grab and above all, the abysmal lack of imagination on the part of political leaders on all sides. Britain, whose departure from India precipitated the partition along sectarian lines, played a particularly harmful role. It was a spiteful act disguised as a concession to peace that resulted in the arbitrary carving up of a nation – like a benevolent and tired elder handing out candies to howling children. Well, the children are still howling and peace remains a precarious commodity in the subcontinent.

    As the BBC reports in an article aptly named Partitioning India Over Lunch, not much thought, vision, compassion or statecraft went into formulating the momentous decision that condemned millions to a grisly and uncertain fate. It was the action of a tired, lazy and callous colonial power which didn’t much care what it left behind after 200 years of occupation.

    While the above story examines the past, in an address to the Indian Parliament, Prime Minister  Manmohan Singh looks forward to India’s future.

    WagahflagsAlthough there is very little in the way of bi-lateral relations between India and Pakistan besides cricket matches, the occasional war and regular border skirmishes, the two countries continue to perform a quaint ceremony that takes place every day at sundown at the border town of Wagah located on the western boundary of India. The daily ritual is a popular attraction for local and foreign tourists and a party like atmosphere prevails on both sides of the dividing line. Readers who have never been to either India or Pakistan, may not know about this tradition.  If you think you might enjoy watching grown men strutting around in turkey-tail headdresses lowering their respective national flags at the end of the day with military precision and dancers’ choreography, do check out the video – it is quite interesting. (Indian soldiers wear khaki uniforms and their Pakistani counterparts are in black.)

    Sixty years after the India-Pakistan partition, the Wagah border is still the only road link between the two countries. Alistair Leithead reports on the mixed legacy for those living in the border zone.

    The soldiers are more than 7ft tall (2.13m) if you count the huge fan-shaped headdresses they waggle at each other like peacocks, just inches apart either side of the India-Pakistan border.

    For 45 minutes every sunset they high kick, stamp, speed march and shout their way through a choreographed routine that ends in the lowering of both flags and the slamming of the border gates.

    The "retreat ceremony", the traditional way to end hostilities for the day, is a lot less aggressive than it used to be – and any tension is cheered away by the baying crowd of thousands who pack the stadiums on either side every night.

    At least now the posturing border guards, yelled on from the stands by chants of India and Pakistan, afford themselves the briefest of handshakes.

    Divided communities

    After the ceremony the crowds stand within touching distance of each other, but the two countries are not supposed to be on speaking terms.

    "Best wishes from India!" says one man.

    But he is warned that too much interaction is banned and over the line a whistle is blown. A soldier pushes the crowd back with his hand, a gun firmly held on his shoulder.

  • After explaining that none of his five adult sons had enlisted for military service because "One of the ways my sons are showing support for our nation is helping me get elected because they think I’d be a great president," Mitt Romney now claims that he misspoke.  

    Mitt Romney, who won the Iowa Republican straw poll yesterday, said he “misspoke” when he suggested that his sons’ work on his presidential campaign was comparable to serving in the military in Iraq.

    "I misspoke,” the former Massachusetts governor said today on Fox News Sunday. "It’s not service to the country, it’s service for me, and there’s just no comparison there.”

    Romney said today that he "didn’t mean in any way to compare service in the country with my boys in any way. Service in this country is an extraordinary sacrifice being made by individuals and their families."

    Governor, we heard you the first time.

  • Acorn An idiom by definition is idiosyncratic – it conveys a meaning that is not always obvious or predictable from its construction. No wonder then, people tend to mangle and modify old fashioned idioms containing  quaint expressions and words of foreign or antique origin to suit their own understanding of the language. A bit of logic too enters the modification according to our perceptions of the world around us. For example:

    • Damp Squib (squib = an obscure name for a small explosive device) sometimes becomes Damp Squid for obvious reasons
    • Vocal Cords (cord = thin rope or cable) is changed to Vocal Chords associated with sound (but why does the misspelling also extend to the spinal cord which is not involved with tonal function?)
    • Fount (a gushing source) of Knowledge appears more impressive to some as the Font (receptacle) of Knowledge.
    • Chaise Longue (pronounced shayz longg, meaning long chair in French) is languidly called the Chaise Lounge, the latter associated with relaxation.
    • Just Deserts (from  deservir in French meaning deserve) may have transformed to Just Desserts due to simple misspelling.

    I often misspell the word "deceit" as "deceipt." Its correlation to "deception" in meaning and the phonetic similarity to "receipt," leads to this frequent error.  My sister’s housekeeper in India who doesn’t speak English, refers to a cell phone as a "celephone." Serving the same utility, the newer technology is clearly linked in her mind to its traditional land line cousin not just in its purpose but also in a rhyming name. Associative linguistic changes and shifting idioms such as those above have been collectively termed eggcorns in honor of someone misspelling the word "acorn" as "eggcorn" (after all, acorns do look like large egg shaped corns). Spellings of individual words too become altered when we misread the origin of the word. The word minuscule meaning very small, derives its roots from minus. The alternate (but erroneous) spelling miniscule is becoming increasingly common because many now trace the word to mini.  For more on eggcornucopia and the frequency of the usage of eggcorns as compared to the original phraseology, see here.  (link via 3 QD)

    There are other words and expressions, not quite eggcorns, that I have occasionally wondered about.  For example, some words exist only in their negative connotation with no  corresponding positive term in common usage. A "ruthless" person, we know is particularly unkind. Yet for the merciful among us, we don’t describe them as possessing veins which are overflowing with the milk of human "ruth."  Similarly "uncouth."  We know who they are – the boorish, coarse and the unmannered types. But we never compliment someone’s gracious behavior as being suitably "couth."

    Two expressions, both slightly sarcastic in their usage, that always confound me just a hair are "over educated" and "same difference." Exactly how educated does one have to be before being disqualified as unsuitable for a particular job or social acceptance?  And why say "same" when one means "no?" 

    Also interesting is how a Hobson’s Choice can also be a Hobbesian one. No eggcorn here but a logical extrapolation of the idiom leading to philosopher Thomas Hobbes who coined a famous and specific Hobson’s Choice – a choice between two options so unequal in their value ("your money or your life") that it is not a choice at all. 

  • It is always easy to send other people and their children into harm’s way when your own backside is not in the crossfire. We have a two "valiant" armchair warriors in charge of the country – the president and the vice president. The former hid among the Texas National Guards and the latter requested five deferments and had "other priorities" during the Vietnam war. Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney too didn’t serve in Vietnam.  He supported the invasion of Iraq and is in favor of Bush’s  military surge for "victory."  His macho stance notwithstanding, Romney now joins Bush – Cheney on the roster of cowardly chicken hawks. 

    Romney has five sons aged 26 – 37, none of whom have served in the military. When asked why his sons did not choose to enlist, Romney replied, "One of the ways my sons are showing support for our nation is helping me get elected because they think I’d be a great president."  Honestly, that is what he said.  Romney also added, "The good news is that we have a volunteer Army and that’s the way we’re going to keep it." Someone ought to tell the multimillionaire businessman / governor that what is voluntary for the privileged may not be so voluntary for those with fewer options in life.

    (I should add here that I have nothing against the younger Romney men not enlisting in the armed forces. Not doing so, does not reflect on their abilities or their integrity. Military service is not the only indicator of a person’s qualification to serve or lead. What irritated me in this story is Papa Romney’s self serving and arrogant explanation.)

    BETTENDORF, Iowa – Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney on Wednesday defended his five sons’ decision not to enlist in the military, saying they’re showing their support for the country by "helping me get elected."

    Romney, who did not serve in Vietnam due to his Mormon missionary work and a high draft lottery number, was asked the question by an anti-war activist after a speech in which he called for "a surge of support" for U.S. forces in Iraq.

    "The good news is that we have a volunteer Army and that’s the way we’re going to keep it," Romney told some 200 people gathered in an abbey near the Mississippi River that had been converted into a hotel. "My sons are all adults and they’ve made decisions about their careers and they’ve chosen not to serve in the military and active duty and I respect their decision in that regard."

    He added: "One of the ways my sons are showing support for our nation is helping me get elected because they think I’d be a great president."

    Romney’s five sons range in age from 37 to 26 and have worked as real estate developers, sports marketers and advertising executives. They are now actively campaigning for their father and have a "Five Brothers" blog on Romney’s campaign Web site. Romney noted that his middle son, 36-year-old Josh, was completing a recreational vehicle tour of all 99 Iowa counties on Wednesday and said, "I respect that and respect all those and the way they serve this great country."

    The woman who asked the question, Rachel Griffiths, 41, of Milan, Ill., identified herself as a member of Quad City Progressive Action for the Common Good, as well as the sister of an Army major who had served in Iraq.

    "Of course not," Griffiths said when asked if she was satisfied with Romney’s answer. "He told me the way his son shows support for our military and our nation is to buy a Winnebago and ride across Iowa and help him get elected."

  • For anyone interested in sci-fi and/or our bizarre futuristic present, may I humbly direct you to a review of William Gibson’s "Spook Country" that appeared in the NY Observer by yours truly yesterday.  It’s not a wholly favorable review, but at least I didn’t refer to the female protagonist Hollis Henry as a "young newsman."

  • Last week I reported the story of Glenn McDuffie, the Houston man who was recently identified as the sailor kissing a nurse in Times Square in the celebrated 1945 Life magazine photo by Alfred Eisenstaedt. The picture seen and recognized by millions, is an historical moment captured by a photographer’s lens, marking the end of World War II.

    Upon being identified, McDuffie, who had served in the US Navy during WWII, described what the day was like when he went into Times Square with a couple of his buddies and later bussed the nurse in celebration.

    On Aug. 14, 1945, he was in Times Square when the word came.

    "When I got off from the subway, a lady told me the war was over, and I went into the street yelling. I saw the nurse and she was smiling at me, so I just grabbed her," McDuffie said. "But we never spoke." …..

    In addition, Gibson (the forensic artis who identified McDuffy) said she "always wondered" about one aspect of the Eisenstaedt image: Why was the sailor’s arm crooked in such an odd way? Only McDuffie could provide the answer, she said.

    "I was kissing her, and then I heard someone running up. So, I realized there was someone taking our picture. I moved my hand so that the nurse’s face would show," McDuffie said.

    Hmm. So, they never spoke (not even a "Thank you Ma’am!) and McDuffy positioned his arm so the nurse’s face would show in the picture?  Certainly looks like he was showboating and there was a certain amount of calculation in the pose which is widely interpreted as a spontaneous celebration. Also it appears that the nurse in the photo was not McDuffy’s first target of affectionate display – he was on a kissing spree that day.  He had gone around Times Square grabbing and kissing several women before the memorable photographic moment. Also, it is reported that the nurse SLAPPED HIM after they disengaged from the embrace. Does explain why they never talked. [Link: Namit Arora]

    (The link at the end of the post opens to a page of Images That (supposedly) Changed the World. The page is a bit iffy – the images are sometimes visible and sometimes not. Click to find out if you can see them. The picture of the Kiss in Times Square is called V-J Day, Times Square, [1945] .It is halfway down the page.)

    On the same page I came across a portrait of Winston Churchill taken by photographer Yousuf Karsh. The portrait reminded me of an ancient pen and pencil sketch of Churchill I had made ages ago. I am posting both portraits below for your critical viewing.

    (Karsh’s photo)Winston_churchill      Churchill_50_3 (my sketch)

  • Alfred Eisenstaedt’s emblematic photo of a sailor kissing a nurse in Times Square in 1945 was made famous by Life magazine. The kiss is widely recognized as an event marking the end of World War II.  Since the publication of the photo, there has been some dispute about the identity of the two kissers. In 1980 when editors of Life sought the two subjects of the famous photograph, one woman and eleven men came forward to claim the honor. After a meticulous investigation, eighty year old Glenn McDuffie of Houston has been identified by police forensics artist Lois Gibson, as the jaunty sailor immortalized in the photo. Precise measurements of his forehead, wrists, knuckles, arms and ears matched those of the sailor in a proportional blow up of the original picture.  Also, among the eleven contenders, McDuffie was the only one who was able to name the two other sailors seen in the photo – "Bob Little, from Buffalo, New York," and "Jack Holmes, from Pittsburgh."

    250pxvj_day_kiss Sailor_2                         

    Sailor

    Glenn McDuffie was celebrating something on Friday other than his 80th birthday — what he says is the long-sought "proof" that he was the sailor kissing the nurse in Times Square in the famous Life magazine photograph by Alfred Eisenstaedt.

    "I am positive it’s Glenn," said Houston Police Department forensic artist Lois Gibson, who McDuffie had approached for help. "I have specific photographic evidence that proves it positively, to me."

    After taking precise measurements of McDuffie’s wrists, knuckles, arms, forehead and ears, Gibson compared them to enlargements of the famous photo.

    To replicate the image, Gibson had McDuffie pose embracing a pillow, as a substitute for the nurse.

    "I don’t say this lightly. What I do is usually a matter of life or death, so I don’t mess around when I identify someone," said Gibson, whom the 2005 book of Guinness World Records said has helped police identify more criminal suspects than any other person.

    Another account of the same story here

    For and update on the story see here.

  • …for winning the Downbeat Critic’s Poll in the Categories of "Rising Star Jazz Artist" and "Rising Star Jazz Composer."

    I’ve only started listening to him recently, but I can heartily recommend his 2005 release "Reimagining," which in general features dense flurries of solos from the pianist and his frequent collaborator, saxophonist Rudresh Mahanthappa on alto sax, over a kind of ominous, propulsive background by bassist Stephan Crump and drummer Marcus Gilmore.  If I have one "project" as a jazz critic/enthusiast, it’s to champion people like Iyer, Matthew Shipp, and Andy Milne, who are finding a way to keep the jazz tradition current by inventing new approaches and composing new songs.  We can’t keep returning to 1938, as great as those classic songs are.

    Those who share my weakness for academic pedantry may also want to dip into Iyer’s Ph.D. thesis, which focuses on the importance of audience and cultural context for performance in West African and African-American music.

  • Do you like hot foods? What is the limit of your personal "heat" index – black pepper, jalapeno, serrano, the slinky Thai pepper or the more daunting Habanero? When does mouth-watering enjoyment deteriorate into eye-watering agony? The Aztecs utilised chilli  peppers in a traditional drink. With heat levels spanning a wide range of "burn," chilli peppers are an essential ingredient in cuisines across the world from Mexico to the Far East, to suit every type of dish and palate. My own palate is far from fire-proof, but I do love hot foods. Sadly enough, as I grow older, my level of tolerance for "heat" is dwindling although I have heard that the opposite should happen with advancing age. I could handle Thai foods at a respectable 3.5 to 4 level of spicy with relative ease just a decade ago. Now I order a wimpish 2. Even then, my refrigerator is always stocked with a fresh supply of jalapeno or serrano peppers which I like to bite into during meals and an assortment of hot sauces to spread on bland dishes. I read once that the Indian born conductor Zubin Mehta carries hot peppers in his pocket when he is invited out to dinner, even to the fanciest banquet. Some people need a touch of "fire" to truly enjoy a meal.  Southern and eastern Indian cuisines are normally hotter than the northern Mughlai cooking which most Indian restaurants serve. I knew that some of the hottest peppers grow in eastern parts of India. But this hot

    470chili0 CHANGPOOL, India — The farmer, a quiet man with an easy smile, has spent a lifetime eating a chili pepper with a strange name and a vicious bite. His mother stirred them into sauces. His wife puts them out for dinner raw, blood-red morsels of pain to be nibbled — carefully, very carefully — with whatever she’s serving.

    Around here, in the hills of northeastern India, it’s called the bhut jolokia — the "ghost chili." Anyone who has tried it, they say, could end up an apparition.

    "It is so hot you can’t even imagine," said the farmer, Digonta Saikia, working in his fields in the midday sun. "When you eat it, it’s like dying." Outsiders, he insisted, shouldn’t even try it. "If you eat one," he told a visitor, "you will not be able to leave this place."

    The rest of the world, though, should prepare itself.

    Because in this remote Indian region facing bloody insurgencies, widespread poverty and a major industry — tea farming — in deep decline, hope has come in the form of this thumb-sized chili pepper with frightening potency and a superlative rating: the spiciest chili in the world. A few months ago, Guinness World Records made it official.

    If you think you’ve had a hotter chilli pepper, you’re wrong.The smallest morsels can flavour a sauce so intensely it’s barely edible. Eating a raw sliver causes watering eyes and a runny nose. An entire chilli is an all-out assault on the senses, akin to swigging a cocktail of battery acid and glass shards.

    For generations, though, the pepper has been loved in India’s northeast, eaten as a spice, a cure for stomach troubles and, seemingly paradoxically, a way to fight the crippling summer heat.

    Now, though, with scientific proof that put the bhut jolokia into the record books — it has more than 1,000,000 Scoville units, the measurement of a chili’s spiciness — northeast India is taking its chili to the outside world. Exporters are eagerly courting the international community of rabid chili-lovers, which has traded stories for years about a mysterious Indian chili. Chances are no one will get rich. But in a region where good news is rare, the world record status has meant a lot of pride — and a little more business.

    "It has got tremendous potential," says Leena Saikia, managing director of Frontal AgriTech, a food business in the northeastern state of Assam that has been in the forefront of bhut jolokia exports.

    In Assam, the wealthiest of the region’s states, the long-dominant tea industry is facing falling prices and rising costs, and one-third of the population lives below the poverty line. Attacks by the militant group the United Liberation Front of Asom and retaliatory government crackdowns, have brutalized the region.

    "Maybe this bhut jolokia can help change things here," says Ranjana Bhuyan, a high-school teacher. "People have been eating this forever," she says.

    The Bhut Jolokia (also known as the Naga Jolokia) made it to the Guinness Book of World Records by scoring a mind blowing 1,001,304 Scovilles on the Scoville Scale of pepperiness. To put that in perspective, please note that the mighty Habanero scores between 20,000 and 35,000  200,000 – 350,000!

    Pepper_chart